Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
metalman
· 7 years ago
· FIRST
Link to full story please, i wanna read into it
3
guest
· 7 years ago
I found the story - not a homeless homosexual man, he was defending two transgender women. Doesn't make it any better of course
7
guest
· 7 years ago
planettransgender.com/sao-paulo-hero-beaten-too-death-for-defending-trans-woman/
2
chakun
· 7 years ago
I just realized it said beaten "to death" and will be deleting my previous sarcastic comment.
1
parisqeen
· 7 years ago
This just makes me sad to think about, people who kill others just because of differences is horrible. As sad as it is, at least he died defending and protecting others.
3
ogchucknorris
· 7 years ago
does it matter that the homeless man was homosexual. Nothing against them but I feel just defending someone from being beaten is just as honorable like you wouldnt say he saved a heterosexual homeless man. I mean I just feel it was an unnecessary thing thrown in there.
3
signaturefox2013
· 7 years ago
If the homosexuality was the reason the homeless man was beaten than yes it is necessary
1
ogchucknorris
· 7 years ago
but was it cause there is no evidence of it at least in the og post
▼
·
Edited 7 years ago
chilledtothebone
· 7 years ago
If they pointed out that he was gay if there was no need to. Like when a straight person dies from a murder, you don't say, "Straight man, 22, murdered last night". But if he was beaten for being gay, then yeah, you'd include that.
1
·
Edited 7 years ago
ogchucknorris
· 7 years ago
I know that is exactly what he said what im saying is was that the case because I cant tell by the picture and a little text if it was. Im just saying the man was beaten regardless of his sexual orientation. That should be the focus that the man was beaten first.
▼
tony007
· 7 years ago
Bravery
▼
