I don't agree here. I agree, the hemp plant can be used for many uses, but in most cases it's just not the best single option. Except one use: as a recreational drug.
Nope. Marijuana can be grown to be good at only one or two of those at a time. If it works well as a drug, it will be useless for the rest. If we can harvest it for hemp, it will be a shitty drug. And so on. The only thing it is uniquely good at it making you high, anything else can be done far better with other plants.
Advertising like this isn't saying it's a good plant that can also be used as a drug.
It's saying it's a drug that can also be used for other things.
Speaking on behalf of those with a rare medical allergy to hemp... I fully support non recreational hemo development. If it made good paper and bad highs, I'd support federal funding. Just. . Not around me, I break out in hives.
Advertising like this isn't saying it's a good plant that can also be used as a drug.
It's saying it's a drug that can also be used for other things.