Wasn't trying to, but I guess I will BECAUSE A LEGAL BATTLE IS WAY MORE EXPENSIVE AND IT'S SOMETIMES BEST TO BIGHT THE BULLET AND PAY UP EVEN IF YOU'RE INNOCENT, SUCH AS MOST PLEA BARGAINS
Okay, so 15 times 20 is? (P.s. I'm not doing the downvotes)
3
deleted
· 7 years ago
I didn't think you werre downvoting me we are having a proper and hopefully friendly discussion and that would be 300 million so yes he would be 100 million out of pocket but the question would be was his credibility and public image worth an extra 100 million?
He also didn't go to jail and still got to live his life doing what he loves (hopefully not children) so there's that
deleted
· 7 years ago
So maybe he shouldn't have given in then and paid up who knows what could have happend maybe it would have cost less maybe more but what happened, happened he paid and the alleged victims were silenced mostly
▼Reply
deleted
· 7 years ago
Just to clear this up:
Here's was not found guilty, yet he wasn't found innocent either. The jury decided there was insufficient evidence prove he actually had molested children. Same sort of thing as the OJ trial.
IMPO I believe that he had molested children, but that in his head it wasn't molestation.
Here's was not found guilty, yet he wasn't found innocent either. The jury decided there was insufficient evidence prove he actually had molested children. Same sort of thing as the OJ trial.
IMPO I believe that he had molested children, but that in his head it wasn't molestation.