That same pope still reckons homosexuality to be a sin, as long as it's acted out. So you won't go to hell for being homosexual, only for doing the fappy thingy. Must be such a relief. Plus his views on gender politics are pretty breitbarty.
What makes this in any way better?
In the other post I called him a good guy, which is my OPINION and not fact. you cannot prove or disprove opinions which is exactly what you wanted me to do.
Because you said. "Look at what he did, he must be a good guy" which is massively flawed. Far better is "he's a good guy, here's an example" or as you did here, just "here's a good thing."
Yes, but it's not like I said that he is the all-seeing persona of Godliness and friendliness and that all he represents is good.
Plus, you're not at all obligated to follow my belief.
I know I'm not, and I don't. All I objected to was a statement implying heavily flawed reasoning. From what I've seen, you seem to be right, but that doesn't change the issues with how you presented the previous one.
In the other post I called him a good guy, which is my OPINION and not fact. you cannot prove or disprove opinions which is exactly what you wanted me to do.
Plus, you're not at all obligated to follow my belief.