Well, i do agree with this for the most part but from the wise words of WTS
"War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it ends." Sometimes violence is necessary
"The crueler it is, the sooner it ends."
Why don't they just atomic bombs the hell out of it then? The war will end in days, along with everything else.
2
deleted
· 7 years ago
We kinda did that to Japan, and it kinda erased a couple cities from the map, but hey, now we have trade partnerships with them, so it's a win, right?
*Edit: SARCASM
While that is true, it should always be used as a last resort. If your goals can still be accomplished using other non-violent actions such as PEACEFUL discussions or protests, that is what should be done first. Jumping straight to violence to get your message across makes your stance look weak and gives everyone else the wrong impression
6
deleted
· 7 years ago
I agree, as hopefully noted by my above edit.
I hoped it was clear that it's NOT a win if you do something like bomb Hiroshima out of existence.
“But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear?…It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.”
“First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”
A nazi has the right to believe what he wants to believe as long as he is not acting in a violent way from his beliefs. A man can say he believes whites are better but he cannot incite violence against another group of people because of it. It is pure ignorance to dismiss someone else and to take away their rights because you feel you are morally superior. That kind of thinking breeds more of them and makes them more extreme and volatile.
well yeah but because they say they are nazis that does not justify you to beat them or assault them or revoke their rights. People have the misconception that if they see someone with a nazi flag or if they see someone give a nazi salute they can go on and beat him that is a lie and that is acting ignorant.
My God, you cannot kill or maim people for their beliefs. Not only is it morally wrong, that is LITERALLY what Nazis did. You are LITERALLY turning into a Nazi
"War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it ends." Sometimes violence is necessary
Why don't they just atomic bombs the hell out of it then? The war will end in days, along with everything else.
*Edit: SARCASM
I hoped it was clear that it's NOT a win if you do something like bomb Hiroshima out of existence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AhGYo9TExU