Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
lblazel
· 7 years ago
· FIRST
So you'd rather have no screening and potentially have a couple hundred terrorists walk through the fucking door? Because if that happens then our shit media is gonna tell the whole world and they're gonna say, "Oh, remember Iraq and Afghanistan? Let's go bomb America!" No screening has already lead to multiple terrorist attacks in Europe, so if having no balls means keeping people safe, then fucking castrate me.
▼
silvermyth
· 7 years ago
It's security theater
3
somespanishguy
· 7 years ago
All attacks on European airports happened way before any screenings
5
rachee
· 7 years ago
There are more options then all or none. Its not the screening that's a problem its the way they go about it, don't search the middle easterner that would be racial profiling search the 80 year old white woman from Kansas so we don't hurt any ones feelings. If screening is about safety search the middle easterner higher probability of finding a terrorist. And any shifty looking guys of any race but can you picture screening a 300 pound black woman from Detroit for a bomb. She is no terrorist would probably beat the shit out of a terrorist for messing up her schedule with her hair appointment but not some one I would worry about being searched for weapons/bombs. So we end up with time and resources being wasted and still haven't achieve safety the shoe bomber got through with out a problem but at least he wasn't racially profiled.
▼
