I got awkwardly confused with this problem at first
7 years ago by guest · 1396 Likes · 8 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
flyingoctopus
· 7 years ago
· FIRST
This is actually true. If the legs are in an equilateral triangle formation.
9
refmococ0
· 7 years ago
Yeah but the centre of mass of a chair with a person sitting on is definitely not in the middle, so the pressure being to the side of the idealistic position is more likely to cause the chair to tip due to the increased distance between the legs which provides more torque. So its less stable
13
jimcrichton
· 7 years ago
You're assuming that all of the legs are equal lengths and that the floor is perfectly flat and level. Yes, in a perfect world, more legs = greater stability. But when accounting for the imperfections of the real world it's easier to balance on 3 points (at least when the object in question is static), because it takes exactly 3 points to define a plane. If we're talking about, say, a moving vehicle like a tricycle, then yes it is absolutely less stable than a 4 wheeled vehicle because there are other vectors to consider besides purely gravitational (at least in a Newtonian sense... ok n/m I'm overthinking this).
2
Show All
chrismir
· 7 years ago
You also have to take into account the materials used as well as surface area the bottom of the legs touches though don't you?
kouyaaotsuki
· 7 years ago
The brother and you takes stability as two different things. For you, stability is the mass that could be held up by an object, for your lil bro, the stability is how stable an object is if you try to shake it
britishclusterfuck
· 7 years ago
You lot so sciency and here I am wondering if they’re still seagulls if they’re not near the sea
1
flyingoctopus
· 7 years ago
Technically they're still seagulls. Where they migrate to or live near isn't really a factor
guest
· 7 years ago
Yeah. Maybe just call them gulls then?