I'm so very sorry, but I find an association like the NAACP hard to take seriously in their stance against racism when the very name of thier organization is racist.
When was the last time that an ethnic group referred to as being "colored" ok? Was it EVER ok?
I may be misunderstanding your view and my comment may not be a counter to your view, so if it does not apply to you I hope you don't feel attacked.
Anyway, it's much easier for an organization to specialize in a particular area or for a particular group, hence why there are many different charities for different causes and not just the everything charity that does the job of all charities.
Also the work of one association doesn't necessarily devalue the work of another, in the same way that trying to improve the lives of a group of people shouldn't have to worsen the lives of those that don't belong to that group. Obviously there are those that would rather take from one group to give to another, but I don't feel that this is the case with NAACP.
I'm a rambler.
When was the last time that an ethnic group referred to as being "colored" ok? Was it EVER ok?
Anyway, it's much easier for an organization to specialize in a particular area or for a particular group, hence why there are many different charities for different causes and not just the everything charity that does the job of all charities.
Also the work of one association doesn't necessarily devalue the work of another, in the same way that trying to improve the lives of a group of people shouldn't have to worsen the lives of those that don't belong to that group. Obviously there are those that would rather take from one group to give to another, but I don't feel that this is the case with NAACP.
I'm a rambler.