No, things aren't that simple

Or light sources

yeah, but oftentimes, the truth isn't nearly that complicated, and more often than not, the absolute truth isn't that hard to find, ain't it?

We can’t actually know if we ever find absolute truth, we can only satisfy whatever our personal burden of proof for truth is. As you say though: the truth may not always be so complicated- Timmy broke the vase because he was angry. Pretty simple in practical terms. This applies more to the fact that truth can be relative to point of view. For instance: Take an issue like immigration. Someone in the south western states was robbed by an undocumented alien. If that person wasn’t here- they wouldn’t have been robbed by them. This is true. They would have been safer with stricter border controls. But- in the same state is a school girl born to a law abiding family of aliens. She is a citizen and an honor student. He dad does charity work, her family are good people. Her father saved a man’s life when he was in an accident out in the field. If her father wasn’t there- that man would be dead. There are many angles and more complexity to immigration- but both views are true at once based...

... on perspective. Having never felt threatened by someone I knew to be undocumented, I’ve had mostly good experiences and seen good people. I don’t see them as a threat. I understand if Someone lived in a pocket of crime such as gang wars spilling over the border or the like They might feel differently. Neither view invalidates the other. They are pieces of a complex and multifaceted issue. Since we humans are biased to certain beliefs- what we would think was the “absolute truth” based on all views we know differs. Some people feel that borders shouldn’t even exist, some feel that “like” people should all be with those “like them” and many are in between or all over. All these people have mostly the same facts and access to the same perspectives on things, but make different conclusions. As humans, we generally must accept truths as relative, and consider that “functional and logical” is the best we can get to “absolute.”

I can’t say I think you’re 100% wrong, but your entire argument boils down to: “If you don’t posses complete omnipotence you are delusional or a leftist.” Humans are incapable of knowing absolute fact for any event. By the nature of how we interact with the world we always only have our own observations and the observations of others. We can take the subjective viewpoints of people and each combine them to conclude what must be the logical “fact” but we cannot know. Two people with the same set of “facts” can conclude a different thing, and compared to the “absolute fact” both can be wrong. We can try to gather as much information, demonstrate repeatability, basically apply burdens of proof like the scientific method to our assumptions and information to at least make sure it is a functional fact- but as soon as new information is available the “facts” as we know them change. Since we can’t know everything about anything, there will always be potentially I’m factored information.