I actually really liked it. I already had a headcannon that he loved Grindelwald. so it felt like my OTP was canon when I learned about it. It wasn't mentioned in the actual story, but it didn't need to be. Remember kiddos, what you see in the story is only a really superficial take on the world.
deleted
· 5 years ago
well, there is really a big amount of lore outside of the books and movies.. a lot of stuff just real harry potter fans who dig deep into this stuff gonna know^^
I have a very strict view of canon. If it's not mentioned in the original books, then it isn't canon. Sadly, I don't consider it to be canon. It definitely has a "you can consider it side canon" thing to it though. Death of the Author and all. Her own ideas about what is and what isn't canon has no more weight than the opinions of any random person.
(I'm aware of the irony of using Death of the Author here. Death of the author is supposed to stop the limitations of the text's meaning while my usage is to directly limit what is and what is not canon.)
(I'm aware of the irony of using Death of the Author here. Death of the author is supposed to stop the limitations of the text's meaning while my usage is to directly limit what is and what is not canon.)