Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest_
· 4 years ago
· FIRST
Sadly all too common for news and even government agencies. When looking to pass certain legislation, they’ll often present law makers of the public with depictions and descriptions of weapons that don’t match the specifications of what is available and being discussed, because they are “more scary.” When the .50 caliber BMG was banned in California, the LAPD and legal team presented law makers with a police and military only model and specifications when arguing why the weapons needed banned. They also forgot to mention that it was a $10,000-$20,000 riffle that shoots bullets that cost $5 each or so.
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
You CAN federally own a grenade launcher where states don’t prohibit it. Scary thought for most people. Although- you need a special permit and to pay a large tax stamp, and the launchers tend to be about $2,000 with each grenade costing around $500 and EACH round requiring paperwork and checks as well as $200 tax EACH. Putting them largely out of the realm of practicality for the average criminal or lay person even when other factors aren’t considered. Now personally- I find the idea a tad excessive- but at the same time- find crime stats for mass shootings or armed crime where riffle mounted grenades were used on US soil.
1
·
Edited 4 years ago
guest_
· 4 years ago
There is a bit of a disconnect and largely it illustrates one of the major issues with discussions on guns- people making decisions and laws largely have little or no knowledge and often misleading or poor information. Bump stocks PROBABLY should be illegal- or at least regulated- but we need to define WHY.
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
Federal law does not restrict the rate of fire of a weapon. The laws on automatic weapons state CLEARLY that an automatic weapon is a weapon which can fire more than one round per depression of the trigger. A “bump stock” requires the trigger be activated each time the weapon is fired- it simply does so in a way which allows one to pull the trigger very quickly. But here’s my point on how the WHY is important- there are devices like trigger cranks that aren’t covered in the bump stock ban. These devices attach to the trigger of a weapon and allow you to turn a crank which rapidly pulls the trigger of the weapons- effectively allowing you to fire “automatic” fire.
1
guest_
· 4 years ago
And so long as ambiguity exists in the law, which is often the result of poorly crafted and hastily implemented reactionary laws- engineers and home hobbyists are free to find creative ways around laws that don’t take the time to understand what it is they are trying to do.
1