The power of brehship beats both tho
4 years ago by icouldbe · 590 Likes · 3 comments · Popular
Report
Comments
Follow Comments Sorted by time
guest_
· 4 years ago
· FIRST
I would disagree. I love freedom and I love life. I love my family and my home. That love, when threatened, is both a powerful survival motivator as well as a power motivator to violence. Violence, to be effective, requires will. If you apply violence without will, your chances of success decrease greatly. Study after study show that people will fight harder to keep what they have than to gain something they do not have. The United States and Russia as well as other world powers like France have learned in places around the globe through 20th century history that to show up, have numbers and better technology, are not enough.
guest_
· 4 years ago
Vietnam, Afghanistan, and so on. These were relatively small forces, poorly equipped, but fighting to keep and protect what they love; against aggressors who had almost every advantage- except will. You can fight on hate- but you’ll tend to lose. The hate of an enemy can be exhausted in all but the most spiteful hearts as bodies pile up and suffering is endured. Those who fight for love though- a parents love for their child tends to know few bounds. They’ll push farther for the love of their child and to protect and provide than they will for the hate of their most bitter enemy.
▼
guest_
· 4 years ago
It isn’t the size of the dog in the fight, it’s the size of the fight in the dog- to quote an old saying. Another old saying I will pervert- of you set out to kill a man for revenge, dog two graves (yours and theirs.) If you set out to kill people out of love- love of your country or your god or whatever- dog a thousand graves, and a thousand more and maybe then some. The Crusades were fought to “bring the love of a god” to those seen as without it. So..... love is the far more dangerous force.