Olga of Kyiv, Isabella I of Castile, Elizabeth I of England, Catherine II of Russia, Boudicca…
the Daily Mail does an article on this saying that over a period of 500 years not only were female rulers more likely to go to war, but they managed it better and quite often reached their goals of territorial gain. these are a few examples from that. there’d totally be wars, and if anything they’d be more ruthless.
deleted
· 1 year ago
Not saying you're totally wrong, cause how would we know, but first of all these were "rulers" in a much different way than nowadays (except for autocrats) and 2nd there was always only one female ruler in a world of male rulers at a given time. We have yet to find out if anything and what would change if there were way more female rulers.
the Daily Mail does an article on this saying that over a period of 500 years not only were female rulers more likely to go to war, but they managed it better and quite often reached their goals of territorial gain. these are a few examples from that. there’d totally be wars, and if anything they’d be more ruthless.