It makes total sense. Just like freedom of speech doesn’t apply to television, internet, digital signboards, billboards, or any other medium invented after the first amendment.
Of course we all know that any religion that didn’t exist when the first amendment was signed isn’t protected too…
What a silly argument. You want to know what else is silly about it? Why do people often assume that anything that didn’t exist when a rule was made is prohibited? For example- the founding fathers had no idea what an automobile is- so since there are no specific provisions to automobile ownership do we assume automobiles have no constitutional protection under any clause..?
Do you think that the Orta of the constitution that grant rights to “all people” only apply to the people that the founding fathers knew about, or groups that existed at that time and not nationalities and ethnicities that didn’t yet exist? Like- anyone who identifies as Thai isn’t protected by the constitution because there was no Thailand when the thing was drafted? Are you so daft that you think that anyone born after an amendment is signed isn’t covered because no one could have known they’d be born later? Social Media director or cable installer weren’t businesses that existed then either- so no constitutional freedoms apply to those industries..? Put on your thinking cap a little longer next time.
Of course we all know that any religion that didn’t exist when the first amendment was signed isn’t protected too…
What a silly argument. You want to know what else is silly about it? Why do people often assume that anything that didn’t exist when a rule was made is prohibited? For example- the founding fathers had no idea what an automobile is- so since there are no specific provisions to automobile ownership do we assume automobiles have no constitutional protection under any clause..?