Paradox resolved.

Of course a contract has to be accepted by both parties or there isn't a contract merely a one sided expectation. To then use that one sided expectation as an excuse to vilify or demean the other party completely defeats the purpose of any Tolerance. This is why it's not a social contract but instead a moral standard. A moral standard doesn't need everyone to accept it. Those that do, fall under that social construct we call a culture. Different cultures have different moral standards and while some standards seem to be cross cultural, nuances will always exist. The argument presented is fundamentally flawed and completely ignores individuality and diversity of thought. It was a good try though.