Actually, due to a court case (the Supreme Court, maybe), the company that manufactures Barbie (I don't know their name) was forced to change her body so that she could physically walk if she was a human. I'm not sure if they made her "thick" enough so that she could conceive kids, but she can at least walk upright now.
She would be over 7 feet and two inches and would only weigh 101 pounds, her boobs would also be so big she would fall over, if she could even get up from being so skinny.
Okay, I'd like to point out the many things wrong with this picture. While I'm not saying that Barbie probably looks very different without makeup, this is a very wrong representation of such.
First of all, this has added lines and shadows that was not there in the first picture. Second, look at the contrasting hairdos. The first, "prettier" Barbie has a very sleek ponytail while the other one looks much more disheveled. Also, the hair colors are very slightly different, the right one being less bright, and the right one is also less shiny and glossy. Also, the second Barbie isn't wearing earrings and earrings tend to cause you to look more feminine.
Let's start with eyebrows: who's to say that her eyebrows aren't that shade naturally? Why did you make them so much lighter? Eyes: the blue eyeshadow is obviously fake and her eyelashes also look fake, but who knows?
Maybe her eyelashes are that long naturally, and even if they weren't, it's not like she wouldn't have any whatsoever as the right picture presents. Also, the right picture gives her bags under her eyes that weren't previously there. True, the makeup could've covered up the bags, but how would you know? It's unfair to give her bags.
Also, her nose appears flatter and smoother in the first picture, but not in the "no makeup" one.
You gave her lines around her mouth that weren't there that caused her to look older. Also, how would you know the color of her lips? Why did you give them such a dull color? They could be redder or pinker—probably not nearly as pink as the left photograph, but pinker. Also, her smile is smaller and that has nothing to do with the lipstick.
May I also point out that the skin tones are very slightly different. In the left photograph, Barbie has a warmer skin tone as opposed to the cooler, duller Barbie to her right. Also, the left Barbie has a rounder face t
rounder face than the right.
Anyways, I just felt the need to point all of this out because is was clearly an act of manipulation. Down-vote me if you want, because a lot of these points can't be proven, but I still wouldn't trust this example.
First of all, this has added lines and shadows that was not there in the first picture. Second, look at the contrasting hairdos. The first, "prettier" Barbie has a very sleek ponytail while the other one looks much more disheveled. Also, the hair colors are very slightly different, the right one being less bright, and the right one is also less shiny and glossy. Also, the second Barbie isn't wearing earrings and earrings tend to cause you to look more feminine.
Let's start with eyebrows: who's to say that her eyebrows aren't that shade naturally? Why did you make them so much lighter? Eyes: the blue eyeshadow is obviously fake and her eyelashes also look fake, but who knows?
Also, her nose appears flatter and smoother in the first picture, but not in the "no makeup" one.
You gave her lines around her mouth that weren't there that caused her to look older. Also, how would you know the color of her lips? Why did you give them such a dull color? They could be redder or pinker—probably not nearly as pink as the left photograph, but pinker. Also, her smile is smaller and that has nothing to do with the lipstick.
May I also point out that the skin tones are very slightly different. In the left photograph, Barbie has a warmer skin tone as opposed to the cooler, duller Barbie to her right. Also, the left Barbie has a rounder face t
Anyways, I just felt the need to point all of this out because is was clearly an act of manipulation. Down-vote me if you want, because a lot of these points can't be proven, but I still wouldn't trust this example.