Triggered?

Guest mentions Malcolm X, you reply by mentioning the Black Panthers. What else did you mean by that? If you don't know what "to insinuate" means fucking google it.

You are stark raving mad. I imagine your last postings in Lewis Blacks voice. Ad hominem you say? What else is there?

Just one of many examples, one of my favourites in RT coverage: The Ukraine. https://www.buzzfeed.com/katherinemiller/insane-moments-from-rts-coverage-of-the-russian-invasion-of?utm_term=.hwpOX1GXqA#.lpWKLYjL6G Now, as this is basically run by the russian secret service, you cannot expect straight lies. It's mainly absurd interpretations of things happening, which may technically not be lies, but could hardly be farther from the truth.

"Never seen em get a story wrong or provide info they can't back." - Yea, I bet you never saw any of that...

...ctnd
And then there's d) and I believe they drove it home for Trump and didn't appear in any of the polls: it's those people who never voted before because no candidate in their lifetime was close enough to Benito Mussolini (intellectual version) or to that drunken redneck in every dive bar who has had exactly the right amount of beer to run an entertaining rant against everything a drunken redneck would hate. Fuck yea, let's fucking do it… hold my beer while I vote.
.
Out of a), b) and c) a lot of people will regret their decision and it will come down to those 20/30% of the population with a genuine rightwing agenda. D) will hopefully not find another candidate next time. If all goes well ;-)
.
Suckster, please do yourself a favour and don't post dumb bullshit in the middle of the night. How exactly would Fox be on a politicians payroll? The fuck does that even mean? Thats just random, incoherent words. You obviously need your sleep.

I live in a comparably civilized area of the world, so I surely didn't cry. Not really looking forward to those annoying american refugees though.
.
The way I see it, there were different motives to vote DT a) you agree with him and his program. The only valid motive in my book. I kind of respect that, thought it males you look a little stupid as he actually HAS no program. b) you did it cause you hate HRC. I get that too, but then why vote this man? Why not third party then? c) you voted DT because all the arrogant liberal smartasses told you not to. Then you have the intellect of an elementary school kid and you should not be allowed to vote. I don't think there are many of those though, even if the self-lacerating left hates itself (it's what they do best, anytime, anywhere) for having driven all these people to DT, its BS. People who say they voted for this reaso often don't want to confess they are a).
ctnd...

"if you put a 180 vs a 180 a male would have the upper advantage" - In 100% of all cases you think? If you say: men are stronger than women, it's simply wrong. If you're 180 lb, you can generate more power out of your momentum than with your muscles. So a 180 lb woman with the right technique could kick a lot of 180 lb mens asses. Also a person with a vagina can have a metabolism that would be defined as typical male, so she could release more muscle power than a person with a penis and a metabolism that would be typical for an average woman. You need to add the word average to such statements or it's wrong, and that's all I'm saying.

Oh I see, so the problem with their pro-Putin bias was the letters U, S, I, A, O, D and Y? And since they got rid of them, they are not paid for and ordered by the Kremlin? Wrong I'd say. Their budget is higher than that of fucking BBC World Service, and the part that's not directly paid for by the russian government comes from companies and organizations owned by Putin's oligarch buds. Part of their scope is interesting info you never see anywhere else, granted. But most is blatant propaganda, a focus on totalitarian and extreme right wing agendas, spiced up with super wack conspiracy theory nonsense of the Monty Python level of absurdity. Their journalistic contribution is stirring up shit. Its like a big box of laxatives of all brands with a few nice MDMA pills among them. You better know your stuff if you plan on grabbing in there, or you might end up with a lot of shit.

Russia Today as unbiased news source? There needs to be a word for that which is like a thousand times stronger than oblivion. RT as source of another view? Fine, why not. But unbiased? C'mon man, really?

Now I get your problem: you're biologically a man but _lots_ of women could probably seriously kick your sorry little ass, not like in those times where women wouldn't even think of anything like that. So you got to stick to such irrelevant facts like which is the stronger sex. You cannot still rule and cannot cope yet. Must really suck to be the likes of you.

He doesn't get science. So listen up, suckster, this one's for you: Comparisons between men and women are never valid for each individual. The possible variety of ANY given property or characteristic within the entire group of women (or men) is a lot wider that than the respective difference between the average man and the average woman. For example the average american man weighs 86 kg, the average american women 74 kg. But of course there are 50 kg women and 100 kg, and not just a few. So the undeniable fact (as in: nobody denies it) that men and women are different and the average man is stronger than the average woman is most completely irrelevant in real life.

"well he was shot cuz he began disagreeing with the violent nature of the nation of islam group he was affiliated with" - yea no shit Einstein. Because he was NOT a terrorist, as you tried to insinuate.

Oh absolutely! What you label as "liberal media" is in crisis, no doubt. But that's actually at least partly because they have started copying Fox' work ethics. Of course they have grown too soft with the powerful people, and there's lots of flaws, but Fox is mainly a teaparty freakshow and an unfunny 24/7 copy of The Tonight Show, which ironically got famous by becoming a just slightly larger than life version of coeval Fox News, when they originally started mocking proper news networks. Too complicated? Stay tuned on Fox!

Of course this happened, and it happened on both sides. But while Trumps ideas were basically at worst shortened or over-simplified, the kind of shit that went down to discredit HRC, and to aggravate people against her and against the "wrong" media is completely unheard of in american history. Of course he's not orange Hitler. Trump's real fond of The Duce. The baroque, narcissistic personality suits him much better than the grim, ascetic ways of the Fuehrer.

What about a 180 lb female boxer against a 115 lb male boxer? Both well trained?

"a good movement hijacked by violent and racist idiots" - you mean like the Republicans? Only much less dramatic?
.
"black panthers were basically terrorists dude" - one could argue that, but anyway, Malcolm X was shot the year before the BP were founded.

More liquid. Less sugar and caffeine. Seriously.

How is that relevant? Women who apply for these kind of jobs will be able to do them, don't you think so? And what about a trained female athlete against an untrained man? The differences within all women, from one extreme to the other, are larger than the differences between the average man and the average woman.

@dancadamorte You said "Trump isn't being sued". Wrong. All Im saying. No, one more: HRCs list is considerably shorter though...

The fact that nobody talks to you is not your republican view on things, it's cause people think you suck. Jonathan Pie would not piss on you if you were on fire. This is to be discussed within the left and none of your fucking business.
.
Look, I get how you find me upsetting. I've insulted women and races here, people with a different opinion, even people who mostly agree with me. just for the heck of it. I strongly implicated shit and then denied it was meant that way, just for the sake of a good effect. I'm mostly an incoherent and unacceptable debater. Guilty of all charges. What I don't get is that this is highly bothering you to such a disturbing extent (you can actually hear isucuk hyperventilate) when it's coming from some anon asshole on a meme mongering internet site, but when the guy you're backing as presidential candidate... you get my drift, don't you?

They all do it, its part of their jobs to sell the news. The other side shows HRC as lethally ill and mentally handicapped, so? How's that a big deal?

Wow, you really discovered a scandal here... journalists edit videos? Who's ever heard of that?
.
You are _really_ 17? You go to a regular school?

Yea, that's utter bullshit. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-trump-lawsuits/
And Assange is not a whistleblower himself. In the beginning he's been running a platform for whistleblowers which progressive people sympathized with as long as it did what they claimed to do. At that time people who were with Trump and the Tea Party and kindred free spirits fucking hated his albino guts. People with a brain got sceptic when Assange (after exposing more and more signs of a narcissistic asshole) turned into Putins personal sock puppet, helping him installing his favourite. Which suddenly made Assange the ultra rights darling, cause "My enemies enemy is my friend" - I bet Putin wets himself laughing anytime he hears that. Jut do a search in the alt-right media about Assange of times before he started delivering on HRC. You were not that interested in politics then I guess, so you didn't even forget, I'll give you that. Just fucking do it and feel ashamed.

Which chairman of which corporation got sued for fraud last year in a way Trump has been? According to you it would be thousands, so that should be easy to back up. Also you're actually proving my point by stating that only few accusations go to court. Trumps fraud accusations DO go there. As well as his habitually screwing contractors and suppliers.
.
You suck: you're like what, 13, 14? You're probably really not alt-right. You're probably just a child eating too much crystal sugar and drinking too many energy drinks. I try to keep that in mind and ignore your sorry ass.
.
I'm not saying anywhere HRC is innocent. I just say she's not been in court for anything she's been accused of, even though there have been numerous investigations and even way more accusations. And putting Assange in the same boat as Snowden and Manning shows you know exactly jack shit about what your talking about. That's like comparing Washington, Kennedy and Trump. Wait... uhm... ok... never mind...