What is it implying incorrectly?

The electoral college is factored into campaign strategy and such, so there's no guarantee that the vote count would have been the same if the popular vote is what counted.
Also, a 2% margin is not "overwhelming".

Bethorien, the point is that whatever did that to helmet would have done to the rider's head had he not been wearing the helmet.

Yeah, that is definitely not blunt-force damage.

"she didn't ask about the animal's history or personality or, really anything other than its aesthetic."
What? She didn't ask about any specific individual animal. There was no reason for her to ask those questions at that point in the conversation. You are not helping your case here.
"Why are you so hostile towards assumptions?"
I'm hostile towards assumptions that are without basis, because that's just veiled bullshittery. I doubt the even actually have hat breed of cat anyway.
Also, the fact was that it's legitimately one of the most retarded things I've seen you say.

"Experienced owners know not to take animals purely for "aesthetic reasons""
She didn't say she wanted it for aesthetic reasons alone and it's retarded to assume that's what she meant.
"this is just an assumption"
Yeah, like I said, horseshit. Your pulling it out of your ass.
And it wasn't an insult, it was a fact.

That's a horseshit assumption, just because someone wants a particular looking kind of pet doesn't mean they can't take care of one.
That is legitimately one of the most retarded things I've seen you say.

Like what?

Hmm. What was the security flaw with swiping?

Just be American, it's better anyway.

fpbp