People being equally valuable is a basic tenet of a free and fair society, its not just my personal opinion any more than your opinion on this is just your opinion. Your basically saying that if someone is below a certain threshold of prospects for their future its more okay to kill them. I don't agree with that. The baby deserves to live because its a person with as equal a right to life as anyone else and its not worth violating that right to save another person from the rigors of carrying and birthing a child. (Assuming that process doesn't pose a significantly higher risk than a normal pregnancy.)

It pretty ridiculous to assert that killing someone would ruin their life, and where did I say "because I say so"?

They're not more valuable, they're equally valuable.

Assuming that there is no increased risk at that age (which I suspect there is), yes.

That's pretty much what it says.

The speech itself isn't limited, it the action associated with or the intended result of the speech.

Hmm. That actually makes it seem slightly less ridiculous. I guess I'd need someone to label each individual one in order for me to grasp what I'm looking at.

I guess. I can't even make sense of the way they look. Aren't charging cords usually some sort or male-male configuration? Where do those female ends go, and why are some of them so wide?

Why are there so many, and what do they all do?

Not really.