The Beast is a human, though.

No, I don't think there's enough information in this tweet to justify the use of such an extreme word. Part of why twitter is hot garbage.

Yeah, but just having a minimum wage means you're already getting paid more that your labor's worth. Its not really relevant to the chart, either.

Yeah, it's not really double dipping if the revenue sources are completely independent of one another and there's no moral hazard, I don't think.

Hmm, to me, that sounds like nitpicking syntax.
Although "rounds of video games" does sound silly out of context.

Huh. Would it not have sounded odd if the image said "They're games. He's texting you in between rounds of games."?

No, but I'm thirty. Do you young'uns just say "games" or something?

"Life isn’t black and white"
In general it isn't, but I think the right to life is fairly black and white, and I don't think this is a scenario where it needs to be, because I don't think the suffering you've outlined is worth killing someone to avoid. I think that's fairly easy to understand, whether you agree with it or not.

"The question is why do you think that a ball of cells that could POTENTIALLY be a human is of the same value as a child that’s alive?"
The ball of cells *is* a human, so it has the same right to life as the child.
-
"why do you not care that their lives are badly ruined when people decide that she shouldn’t be allowed to abort?"
I do care, but it's not worth killing someone to avoid that.
-
"Is the baby being alive more important than the baby being born into a terrible life?"
Yes.
-
"With that logic because a life has value should we not put down a pet that is suffering endlessly?"
You could make that argument, but I eat animals, so it would be silly for me to argue against them being killed.
-
"Would you rather let people suffer if it meant that they both live?"
Definitely yes.
-
"If a boy gets raped and the woman that raped him gets pregnant is he now gonna be forced to pay child support?"
Preferably not, obviously.