@karlboll
@anthracite
Citation [25] on that Wikipedia page doesn't seem to exist, and the FBI disagrees.
ucr(dot)fbi(dot)gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/violent-crime/rape
@natethegreat
Then why did you bother commenting in the first place?

@karlboll
What's the statistical chance of date rape?
@natethegreat
Feel free to elaborate, brother.

That's paranoia and a good example of why those aren't good scenarios to use to promote that coded language. People shouldn't be encouraged to be paranoid.

No, fuck all of you, there's no reason to believe that the scenarios described in the image are anything that serious. Nether scenario was about a safety concern, they clearly just didn't want to be in a mildly awkward situation and used preset coded language to avoid being decent people by making shit up.

Both scenarios could have been better solved by being honest, there isn't any need for a coded message.

You think that sounds PC? Here in Canada the PC term is "First Nations Peoples".

@famousone
That's what I thought too, but I heard people with university degrees say otherwise. University degrees. Imagine how smart they must be, I can't imagine they're wrong.
@iccarus
lmao

@iccarus
Well, I'm told that a woman is anyone who identifies as woman, so with that settled, surely it makes sense for a significantly stronger woman to have an advantage in a boxing match (assuming an appropriate weight class match up, and anything else like that)?

Well now hold on there, I'm given to understand that male and female refer to sex, while man and woman refer to gender. Checkmate, bigot.

How can it possibly be unfair to women if she, herself, is a woman?

lol

Its fun watching people try to judge and explain something unknowable, so that point is interesting, but probably not answerable by design.