so that's not dirt?

i find it amazing that only one other thinks without the rifle brought, nothing would happen. You can't see that it escalated the situation to where guns were drawn and lives threatened.
And no, he was doing nothing wrong, but bringing a rifle to the riot was seen as a challenge, as evident by people challenging him.

wow, downvote someone for asking a question.
as for the night in question, so no one was assaulted and killed, and no one was carrying a rifle openly.
So it could be safe to assume that without the rifle, nothing would have happened.
Of course you won't go carrying a rifle openly to prove your point, because you'll get pulled over and questioned rather quickly, and not the cops saying "nice gun" and walking away.

except it escalates the situation, is that really so hard for you to believe?

simple question, you say you've answered, but haven't seen it.
How many people were killed prior to Kyle's shooting in that riot, on that night?

ok, prove it, make a video in a strip mall, near a school, government building with a rifle and show me how the cops don't question you

bring rifle to riot and not expecting violence: Moron

a CC? you mean carry conceal, that's completely different to open carry, you do realise that? I'm not the one that resorts to slurs or threats.

and you have no evidence either, that without a rifle, he would not have been picked out, the rifle caused an escalation in a confrontation, it didn't diminish it.
Besides, I already know you're full of shit, you discredited your self when you said you can carry a rifle in public and the cops don't question it. You stated they "admire" your gun. Sure, the police see someone in public with a rifle, and go up and say 'nice gun" and keep going, cause that's what cops do.

don't admire him, but was it an open carry state?

do you think he was bullied, maybe by people such as yourself calling him "micro-dick" as pushing your own insecurities on others?

and, i'm just saying, if he had no gun, there's a high probability that he would not have been attacked. Why is that so hard to believe?

i wonder how many get that reference

The new batmobile is how a billionaire would build it in secret, not using a multi-billion dollar R&D facility where dozens of people know about it.

and you're still single?

and some random citizen is not the hero either.
you firmly believe without the rifle, he would have been killed no matter what, mainly due to the dozens of unarmed people shot in the head prior, on that night, in that city.
I believe, without the rifle, he would not have stood out in the crowd and ignored like everyone else.

well, more than retail at least

"stupid hobbit, stretched out my ring"

but, . . . my precious