sp because you dpn't agree with their rules, you won't follow them? that's it?
Many follow the rules and have no problem with it, some don't and have a good cry over it. I'm all for those that don't want to be vaccinated, they just have to accept the consequences, such as, not being allowed into certain areas, businesses or even countries. Airlines require proof of vaccination before checking in when flying international, so why would it be a surprise when an unvaccinated is denied?

so if new rules are brought in, regardless on what it's for, you don't have to follow them because they are new? how do they bring in new laws if no one will follow because they are new?

whether it's baseless or immoral isn't the point, it's their current rules for admission.
To recap, if you're bringing a firearem into a violent situation, no, there's little to no chance anyone will get shot, how could that even happen?

i just know that most places, even countries, don't allow entry unless fully vaccinated, exceptions if they have legitimate reason not to be vaccinated. take Novak Djokovic for instance, not vaccinated, came into Australia to play tennis, lied, deported.

the older family members would need to be vaccinated to stay there, it's pretty much the requirement now for nearly all places.

spare goat in case the main goat goes flat

not that it's an assumption it's in Australia, but that it would, like most other businesses, require vaccination to enter or stay. So why it a surprise they kicked out when it would have been a requirement to be there in the first place?

i don't assume, I'm in Australia, it's a requirement to enter the country

riding the rails?

what was the post about?