It would be more interesting if they isolated data based on region. I'd hazard the guess most people against the protest are city dwellers. And the majority against the mandates are primarily rural. Just a guess.

Honk

They went against the big government/big pharma plans to end the pandemic, they had to be silenced for our safety, we shouldn't question these things, because they obviously care about us and couldn't have any alternative motives.

Doesn't the kits also have things like clean needles?

I'm no expert, but isn't it standard practice to just blow it up? If so, sporting good outlets usually sell pint size containers of black powder

Guest_ can simply himself, what I got out of it is BLM is rooted in Marxist ideology, so they can still receive donations, but a few Nazis and racists are found in a convoy that numbers in the thousands and from all walks of life, can't receive donations, from GoFundMe anyways. Guest_ if I missed the mark I apologize.

Let me make something clear, property damage is always a bad thing, not matter the mob. But the sheer scale of arson, vandalism, looting and property damage BLM accomplished during the 2020 summer of love on a completely different league compared to this convoy. The tone is more than a little different too, my understanding is one statue was vandalized, the the protesters have posted a constant gaurd to cease further vandalism. And the media coverage? Again, I dislike crime, but one is very clearly more destructive and sets a far more violent tone don't you think?

Well, anything is possible on paper. Solar and wind have become more efficient, but not in the leaps and bounds we would need to see. We would need to see a new tech breakthrough in energy storage (batteries) before this can become anything more than posturing to look good. Nuclear isn't an obvious answer to this problem by the way. But if we want to do something that is actually good and see tangible results that don't end up in a dump in 20 years, we are going to have to get serious about nuclear. Solar and wind are just not at that level yet, and reality is it may never be. But so long as it's propped up by media and government interests, you mostly get fed BS and people eat it up.

We are all going to die anyways, do you actually want to have a conversation or are we just here taking pot shots at each other? *Lights cigar*

Well, just like I dislike all the powerful interests in big oil, there are way too many hands, particularly in big government, that wants to shoe horn in anything 'green'. The lifespan of windmills and solar panels aren't what they need to be. The materials used to make them take fossil fuels to mine and don't easily recycle. And truly it's a shame because in the electrical field we were hyped about this tech for a while, because we could finally compete with the oil industry. But all the hype was bunk and couldn't produce a 1/10th of the output promised. Personally I think those who REALLY looks into green energy for more than hip or trendy reasons usually conclude nuclear is the future. And the main opposition usually get their sources from the tv show Chernobyl.