jeremy

jeremy


— jeremy Report User
Tom Holland made the most subtle spoiler joke ever 7 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
NSFW maybe? for spoilers?
5
This should be an official rule 5 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
wow that's big cringe
16
Very kind of them 3 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
Such kind gentlemen - er, ladies
2
This will improve productivity by 1000% 7 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
I bet that's not all they do
Good idea 5 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
There's no way he complied and meekly kept his mouth shut while she worked a zip tie around his braces
6
Basically 9 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
Actually, 1984 warns against constant war. If you've read it, you should know that the state is constantly at war, and the government uses this war as a pretext to oppress its citizens.
6
Two Gorillas pose with the anti-poaching rangers who guard them 2 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
please stop with the reposts
I wish my kids will understand 9 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
trypophobia much
Twitter is anti-anime 7 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
I think it's getting a little cringy at this point
1
Hamburger details 5 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
so what is a Berliner . . . ?
Not funny Dad 2 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
very epic! Thank you, 2016
6
Cement: 1. Bike: 0 2 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
Those tracks tell a story. A story of an idiot
1
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
You ask how killing an NPC is different from killing an ant or torturing a butterfly. The answer is simple. Insects feel pain. NPCs have no nerve centers
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
Intelligence requires that she have thoughts and be aware of them
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
First of all, a sentience test seems entirely reasonable. We can hardly have lawyers ascribing fundamental human rights to toaster ovens to exploit loopholes in the law. There is no software in Sophia that allows for her to be conscious of her thoughts, she is a chatbox. If all she does is spit out pre programmed responses, where then does here consciousness reside? There are no transistors set up to allow for that function. Will you now suggest she has a soul?
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
The difference between a low functioning intelligent animal and Sophia is general intelligence. That is the necessary factor for something to be intelligent
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
even animal brains are more complex
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
And you say that we can't understand the human brain, which is contradictory. Sophia can be easily understood, we can pick apart her code and see exactly what causes her to do what. No so at all with a human brain. The top neurologists of today cannot unravel the mysteries of the brain, human or otherwise, and yet you equate that to a few lines of code that tell a computer how to say "Good Morning".
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
There are multiple tests to determine whether something possesses independent thought, and I think the coders of Sophia know that what they created does not meet any kind of standards for general intelligence. If you define "intelligence" as being able to respond to certain stimuli with a series of pre-programmed responses, then sure Sophia is intelligent. But then you'd have to make the case that every NPC in every video game "may or may not be intelligent". Maybe I should stop killing villagers in Minecraft in case their branching decision trees indicate that they are conscious. When the trader offers me emeralds in exchange for wheat does this mean he understands economics?
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
Are you seriously insinuating that "Sophia" is conscious? You must have all the AI expertise of a kindergartner. Even Sophia's creators have said that they know she is not conscious. She has all the independent agency of a Skyrim NPC. I can't believe I'm having this conversation
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
I'm sorry in what way?? You are literally talking about treating the equivalent of a couch with respect. They are not alive, they cannot think, they are not even like animals! Sure, if in the future, scientists manage to achieve true artificial intelligence, then that is a very fair statement, and robot rights will be a significant issue. As of right now it is not. At all.
Outstanding move 5 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
yeah literally no one asks older generations to talk like them
1
Well said Sophia 39 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
although irrelevant because we have no thinking functioning man made entities right now so it really doesn't matter what the fuck we do to them. They are literally objects, you understand that right?
or is very smart 3 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
god the IQ levels are over 9000 with this one
Be nice and patient you absolute fools 11 comments
jeremy · 5 years ago
Trying to read that purple on black font raped my eyes