i believe this whole thing has been one huge misunderstanding. saying that, i'm out!

i'd guess there has to be at least the green-with-envy vulva if of course the pink one has been looking good enough lately :D

you mean we should let the kids starve to avoid them being exposed to ... what, their mother's breasts?
or you mean other kids, those that are like 3 or 7 and have already been exposed to their respective mothers' breasts? god forbid the see any more of those, right? it would corrupt their little souls straightaway.

as much as it pains me to admit it, garlog is right XD

i'm a huge fan and i didn't know this so, yes. well.
@OP, thank you!

a singer who hates on those who admire her does not inspire admiration, huh? :DDD

...implying one should never help anyone to avoid having to...ever help anyone?
nice. some life-rule that is.

we live in such a backwards world i sometimes wonder how is it we can still walk straight.

psychotic and psychopathological are two different things. look it up.
meanwhile, i'll continue to be scared bc you think killing one's sister to see a hot dude again is the kind of behaviour that 'uses logic'. D:

your comment literarly makes 0 sense to me, sorry.

i was so about to make a poisonously calm correction regarding the utterly wrong use of the term 'gender' here but hey, you did it first! *fist bump*

teeth being or not being part of the skeleton is not a /fact/. it's a matter of definition. people have always disagreed on definitions and they'll continue to do so. my imaginary wife saying she's pregnant is only a fact if a gynecologist confirmes it, using proof (ie an US pic of the fetus). i've explained why i believe teeth are not part of the skeleton but that's not proof that they're not, it's just a way to look at the problem. know what i mean?
oh and i'd greatly appreciate if you could please tell me what the fuck is skeletal system if not just bones. did you mean cartilage? blood in the bone marrow? because that's hairsplitting and it doesn't make you right.
also, i provided arguments to support my point of view. meanwhile, you people just keep /claiming/ things. what's up with that?? do yout think that everything you utter is an undebatable fact?

but i am a fucking expert. :D surely there are other experts who consider them to be a part of the skeletal system but i do not. can we politely agree to disagree?

i would argue that they're not, in fact, part of the skeletal system. its primary roles are support, movement, protection. can't see teeth doing any of these things, except the last one and even for that you'd have to use other bones (and muscles attached to bones) to use the teeth for defense purposes.
besides, if you look at a skull, the teeth sit in their socets in the mandible and maxilla. they're not attached by muscles or tendons but with special fibrous goo or whatever. no other bone is kept in place in a similar way. basically teeth are just... organs except they're hard as fuck instead of slushy and floppy.
thinking back, it might have not been a good idea to challenge me on this subject, eh? *gives the "it's all cool, bro smile&nudgeTM"*