His question was whose responsible for injuries? While not answering the question you postulated that they could have green lighted it if it was inspected by a licensed inspector and the appropriate filing was done. That still makes an assumption that it would have passed. If a licensed inspector did inspect it and it failed what would the city do? They'd tear it down. It would only be petty/malicious if it passed inspection and they tore it down anyway. To answer his question, the city. The city may then fine the builder and make them pay for the removal and possibly the medical fees but the city would still be held liable for the injuries.

A repost is a repost. It may be new to you personally but that doesn't change the fact it's a repost. For years this wasn't such a big deal on this site but it seems in the last 4 or 5 months there's been a huge uptick in reposting older posts. Some from as far back as 2012, at least from what I've been able to track down. It's like someone is going through post from years ago and just reposting them.

Two years ago. Title is "A retired mechanic and a homeless man builds stairs for the city" funsubstance . com/fun/425096/a-retired-mechanic-and-a-homeless-man-builds-stairs-for-the-city/

@interesting You're making the assumption they didn't do just that and had to remove them anyway because it failed to pass code. Stairs have quite a few codes they have to meet and external stairs more so, hillside access has its own codes all of which has to be met or you can't build/it has to removed.

Give or have? Cause if it's have then every adolescent boy already has that superpower.

Or that gravity would cease to exist for you during the jump process and possibly flinging you out at the speed of your movement at the time of the jump. It's really all guess work at the moment since we really don't know enough to know what questions we should be asking. Let alone how to test for the answers.

In reference to @timebender25's comment That makes a pretty big assumption in and of itself. We barely have a grasp on how gravity affects matter and while it's postulated that gravity can affect time it's really only affecting the perception of time. Time itself is, at best guess, relative based on our observation of reality in conjunction with movement. That can't rule out a constant that may only be observable from outside our gravity well. If someone managed to figure out how to manipulate "time" and remove themselves or something from our perception time. And could then put themselves someplace else in that time stream, for lack of better word, there no way to know if gravity would act like an anchor. It's just as likely that you could experience all the gravity that would exist in a given area for the amount of time you jump and therefore exposing yourself to hundreds or thousands of g forces at once.

That's 17636005726.557 miles a year. Doesn't take long to lose complete sight of the earth.

The sun moves, the solar system moves, the galaxy moves, all rotating, spinning, and traveling. Even standing absolutely still you're still traveling at around 900km/s.

I've explained on here before that, it's quite likely if time travel does exist until they develop faster than light travel or only jump in tiny moments with a space craft, time travelers probably ended up killing themselves simply because the earth moves.

Both states grow oranges and sell them to the other.

I live in Florida. Statistically, you're never more than three feet from a spider. I've known this for several decades. I generally sleep just fine. Household spiders, barring the brown recluse, are generally harmless.