Lucky11

lucky11


— Lucky11 Report User
If you’re sick still come 11 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I cannot begin to tell you how much I agree and wish this would happen too.
These fashion trends are out of this world 1 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I am confused. Was there a trend of wearing nothing in January? Cause I completely missed that.
4
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I always enjoy these conversations so you don't ever need to worry I'm going to be offended. You've always been respectful even when we disagree and that's what really matters. Being able to have discussions about topics with differing points of view or even opposite points of view without devolving into insults or accusations is quickly becoming a rarity in our current society. It's also something that becomes almost impossible with the way social media works. The opposite is sadly not true.
1
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I can see what you're saying and can understand your viewpoint. I don't think we'll ever completely agree since I do think there is an objective measure of racism. Of course regardless, I get the feeling the outcomes of our dealing with racism would be remarkably similar. And you're quite right that at the end of the day it's people and our need to be superior that's ultimately at fault. Even in cultures where there isn't much or any racial diversity we still manage to find something that we believe makes us better. Whether that's religion, education, money, material possessions, or lineage we have ample examples of it throughout history.
1
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
This doesn't mean I think actual bigotry and racism doesn't happen. It does. And we should root it out whenever we find it. But just because someone cries wolf doesn't always mean there are wolves. And sometimes the person crying wolf is the wolf.
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Without an objective standard anyone can accuse anyone of anything and have them punished for their "crime" regardless of the evidence because in their minds that person did the crime. This is the kind of thing we're seeing more and more of and it's just beyond stupid. This is exactly how we get moronic ideas like the original PSA.
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
We've got this horrible trend happening in our society where if someones feelings get hurt or you don't agree 100% with their viewpoint you're accused of being racist or bigoted. Nevermind the fact that their viewpoint may be the racist or bigoted one, it's you that's being unreasonable. Part of this is people refusing to use reasonable standards i.e. definitions of words and instead redefine them on the fly based solely on their feelings.
2
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I think you've taken something and run with it without taking into account what I actually said. For the most part I absolutely agree with you. You even restated exactly what I said, in your rebuttal of the second point, as your point. The problem is that the victim can't be the only judge that determines whether something is or isn't racist. In your example about being loud if you are in fact not being loud but the "victim" decides your are, are you being loud? No you're not. That was the point I was trying to make. It's also why I pointed out that judges have to have so much experience, training, and learning.
· Edited 4 years ago
*cough* *cough* Racism 53 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Yes, we absolutely can. Racism has a definition: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. Determining whether something is racist is not predicated on your race. Now you may not realize something is racist when it actually is, because it meets the requirements previously mentioned, in which case perspective is what may be needed to point it out. But that also means that something may not be racist even though you may say it is because it doesn't meet the aforementioned requirements. If you try to make racism this nebulous thing that can only be determined by the victims then everything and anything can be racist simply because they say so. And that is not a good enough reason to make any definitive judgements. There is a reason things are carefully codified in our laws and judges have to have years of experience, training, and learning.
10 · Edited 4 years ago
Im not even sure tbh 5 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
The 6969 day of the century was Wednesday January 30, 2019.
Im not even sure tbh 5 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
6969 days ago was Wednesday April 11, 2001
Proposed airline seating POST COVID-19 17 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
That's the conclusion they came up with too. But in the off chance it doesn't end in a flaming ball of destruction they give you a better chance than other seats would. Certain death vs almost certain death.
1
This would make me so happy 8 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Here's a fun bit of maybe about John Constantine: (9) gag . com/gag/az8LDzK/the-curse-of-john-constantine
1 · Edited 4 years ago
Proposed airline seating POST COVID-19 17 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
So I'm all for more individual space on an airplane but I also know that airplane seats are very specifically designed. In the case of a crash their design has been proven to help increase your chance of survival. Mythbusters even did an episode about this and came to the conclusion that the way they're designed does help significantly even if you won't be injury free. So with that in mind I'd be happy for any change in the seats that accomplishes the same thing and gives me better separation from the people beside me.
4 · Edited 4 years ago
The cake was a lie 11 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Masterchef US Season 6 Episode 8
1
If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding 3 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
How can you have your pudding if you don't eat your meat?
2
They did way better this time 1 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Didn't the original animation studio go bust and close because it cost so much money to redo?
Idiocracy 10 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I've put a bit of thought and done a bit of research on this topic. Short answer is you'd probably just be killed. Most cultures in the past didn't put much value on life and it's extremely doubtful you'd be able to even speak to people for quite some time until you learned the language. Generally speaking you'd only be able to travel 150 to maybe 200 years into the past and still be able to communicate with anyone at a fluent level. Being able to speak at a fluent level, unless you were stupidly lucky, is kinda a prerequisite to trying to explain technology. Even assuming you knew how, had the technical skills needed, and materials given to you most of the tech we use today just plain requires too much other tech to even create. Generating electricity is actually one of the easiest things to do but being able to use it? That's tough. And without tangible results hardly anyone is going to care or even give you the time of day.
2
YEET 1 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure none of the children in the movies die.
Need more photos like this 6 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I feel like I'm going to be stabbed.
2
Like a GOT f**king creatures 8 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Well the word bear just means the brown one since the original word for bear wasn't spoken lest you summon one.
2
Dha dha dhhhaaaaaa 2 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
I Am Legend.
1
Work socks 2 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
Surprises let me know she cares
2
Get it. 11 comments
lucky11 · 4 years ago
You certainly can, but it doesn't make it true. It just means you're either lying to others about yourself, lying to yourself about yourself, or both.
5