Speaking of Nazi's that exactly what the Nazi regime did once they were in power. They made their opponents (anyone who expressed opinions other than their own) illegal. They shut down anyone who didn't agree with them. Now I am not defending Supremacists ideas but the moment you silence someone because you don't like what they're saying or don't agree with it you've become a Nazi. The solution is to be just as loud if not louder than them. That way people hear your voice instead of the bigots and you get to not be a bigot yourself.

That was totally my take.

It's not the kindness of others that paves the way to hell but instead our own misguided kindness. It can be a kindness to do what is best for others even to our own detriment. However, not everything we think is a kindness actually is one and it in fact could be a detriment to the ones we seek to be kind to instead. That is why I call that saying naive.
Theodore set the sole condition to obtaining wisdom as being through kindness. Wisdom, is simply the application of knowledge. Now you can learn wisdom from kindness but it is far far from the only source and most wisdom is actually learned from failure.
What you have described is actually the use of wisdom for the application of kindness. The wisdom was not derived from the kindness. That same wisdom can be applied to the application of hate as well. Vladimir Lenin was a wise man, evil yes, but also a wise man. Many conquerors, tyrants, and murderers were wise. I like and applaud your mindset but it is, in my opinion, naive.

I only used most likely because I didn't know what inspiration the artist had in making the piece. The production could have been important but in most art the process of making the color has little if nothing to do with why the piece exists. Instead it's the painters preference or needed to achieve a specific outcome.

Okay, but 12k words? No way. Most of what you just listed could be described in a paragraph per item. If I was a teacher and you did a paper on this and went into detail about how the color is produced I'd fail you. How the color is produced mostly likely has very little to nothing to do with the picture itself. Now, I can see if the paper was titled something along the lines of "(title of the piece): the methodology, production, and inspiration used". Again that's pretty superfluous but I can see that being a much longer paper. Not one I'd want to read, and again just justifying the degree, but I'll grant you it could be long enough.

12k words on a solid color rectangle with a borderline. Yeah, he put snow in there. There is not a infinite way to describe something. And you can re-describe something a multitude of times, but eventually you're just repeating yourself but using different words. That being said the simpler the item the faster you end up repeating yourself. Now there may be a bit about the artist and the history of the style or what influences might have attributed to the piece but it's still just a solid rectangle with a border. This is type of thing you see in academics when someone has to justify what they're learning or teaching to others solely because it has no other real purpose so they make one up.

However, by the time they had sufficiently regained their strength it was apparent that the tech advantage of the Europeans was practically insurmountable.
If there hadn't been such a huge reduction of the natives prior to this and there wasn't the fear of the newcomers gods chances are things would have gone drastically different. If the settlers had shown up before the epidemic it's generally agreed that the natives would have just constantly attacked the settlers, who would have been seen as an encroaching tribe. The lament in the second part reflects not just the final outcome but also the loss incurred by the diseases that killed most of those that died.

You may dislike Steven Crowder, or you may not, but he visited a Museum and they covered many of these topics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_KlDf-Wgoc&ab_channel=StevenCrowder

Lilith as you've described didn't make an appearance until at least 600AD. It also seems to be an amalgamation of a night creatures, night monster.... etc. Since then there's been alot of mythology created about her. Probably to make the story more interesting. The idea was romanticized, in the classical sense, extensively through the middle ages leading to the current form of Lilith.

There were many in the past that held similar values we do today. Some of them spoke out but many just didn't get slaves. Just like today there are those that completely abstain from using fossil fuels and speak out against it. Problem is the culture needs to change in order for massive reforms to not only get headway but also become more popular. The industrial revolution was one of the leading forces changing the culture back then which made slavery less important. A single man could suddenly do the work of 10 reducing the need for for such a large single purpose labor force. President Washington even covers many of these concerns in his letters speaking about his will. He didn't really like slavery but couldn't see how to eliminate it with causing massive problems. That's the problem with any system which relies almost solely on one method to function.

If you're caught it's the misdemeanor offense of improper disposal of a body and can carry a hefty fine and possible jail time. So don't get caught.