I think may be disappointed in myself for knowing exactly who that is.

That's the way I like it

ଏହି ଭାଷା ଗୁଗୁଲ୍ ଅନୁବାଦରେ କାହିଁକି ନୁହେଁ?

All crimes are banned but not all bans are crimes, legally speaking. And just because something is illegal doesn't mean it's wrong nor does something being legal make it right.

300 pages is a about 3 hours worth of reading so I don't think it's all that much.

I have easily over 300 books and can count on one hand the ones I haven't read. 30 books would even begin to cover the ones I reread every year or so. This definitely does not spark joy.

Well, yes but also no. Depends entirely on the density of the wood making up the axe and the tree you want to chop down. It'd be a massive pain to do even if you did it right but you could do it. The heartwood of a super dense ironwood tree would need to make up the blade. It'd also have to be huge cause even properly treated it wouldn't hold an edge and you'd have to constantly resharpen it. The tree you cut down would have to be light, probably Balsam or something similar.

Dark

Not trying to being mean but mediocre talents are generally talents that people never put the effort in to get better. Now, I'm basing that on the premise that talents are natural abilities in any given area. Not to be confused with people that never get great at something they've put alot of effort into. If you're mediocre at something you've put a ton of work into that just means you didn't have a talent in that area. That doesn't invalidate your ability, it just means you didn't have a natural talent in that area. Plenty of the greats didn't have talent in their areas but through massive effort and good teachers they've bridged the gap between the talentless and talented. The downside is that if a talented person puts just as much effort into it they'll most likely be that much better than their counter parts.

Well, "regular" bugs are eaten by many all across the globe so I don't see the problem. Honestly, this is a bit condescending. This is like someone deciding that red isn't a color because it falls into the 625–740 nm wavelength. And to them any color that falls into that range is not a color. I mean I'd get it if there was some sort of ethical or moral reason but this is just I don't like that therefore you don't get to like that either.

See now that makes me want to see a movie that takes place during modern times where every mythological being of a particular culture suddenly exists. All of them. No exceptions. Then watch as people scramble to remember all the old tales, the folk tales, the old wives tales that told them how to deal with those beings.

These are beyond dumb. A more accurate depiction: Picture Earth^^ completely fine and smiling. Then picture one hair sliding forward. There. That's it. That's the entire extent of the effect of humans on the planet. A momentary blip hardly even noticeable by the planet. The planet meanwhile doesn't care a single iota about it's ability to have life, support that life, or what that life might entail. If anything humans comparable to the benign microscopic life that lives on your skin. Not the ones could cause an infection if they get in a wound. Just the ones that live, eat, breed, and die by the billions that we don't even notice because they do nothing to us nor could they even if they tried.

I use a Rainx windshield wash that's pretty handy. It means that in most cases my wipers only need to be on low or timed settings and everything is perfectly visible. You never want to be the guy that has it set on high for just a little bit of rain. What ticks me off is when you see people who don't turn on their headlights when it's raining. If your windshield wipers are on your headlights, according to the law (US), should be on. I have yet to see a State that didn't have inclement weather as a criteria for when you must have your headlights on.

This makes the large assumption that those knowingly choosing wrong (i.e. unethical or immoral choices) actually care about those choices. A good person who chooses to do the wrong thing may experience guilt over it. A bad person could probably care less and be completely happy with their choices.

Either strawberry or vanilla. Either is good. I have yet to taste a chocolate that was actually good.

Knowing that it's The Onion and what that means and moving onto the you really expect me to believe that man has 45000 friends? I thought their whole schtick was that it's generally a somewhat believable story even if absurd and completely made up.

I can see three totally legit reasons why this would happen. First, someone agreed with or was loyal to Hitler and purposely didn't remove the picture because it would then be destroyed. Two, someone was just lazy and had a "million of these things to do" and just slid it up there because "I literally could care less". Three, it was a practical joke that probably just got forgotten about.