Well that's easy. All you have to do is just look at it for a few moments and you'd see it too. Obviously there are only two that could really use the decrescendo but only the one without moving into the overly dramatic. It's not hard. Just look at the argument, counter argument of them while not ignoring the supporting elements of the other parts. Is it building tension or resolving? Of course you don't decrescendo the resolving that's just silly. Unless, of course it's needed for effect. At least half of these are in the building phase and you certainly aren't going to be putting a decrescendo there, well unless the counter part is needed to build the tension to offset the main line, but that not pointedly not the case in these selections.

Person 1: You're gender fluid?
Person 2: Yes, sometimes I'm a man and sometimes I'm woman.
Person 1: Okay, and it says here you think all men are pigs?
Person 2: Lol, yes men are just pigs, they never treat you with the respect you deserve.
Person 1: But sometimes you're a man. Does that make you a pig?
Person 2: Well no because I'm a woman.
Person 1: ?? But you said sometimes you're a woman and sometimes you're a man.
Person 2: Yes, I'm genderfluid.
Person 1: So when you're a man you're a pig.
Person 2: Well men are pigs but I'm not a pig when I'm a man.
Person 1: But all men are pigs?
Person 2: Yes, just not with me. I'm not a pig.
Person 1: Then not all men are pigs.
Person 2 : No, all men are pigs.
Person 1: Then you're not a man.
Person 2: How dare you!! Who are you to .....

Yeah no, there have been several that have written more than nine and likely the most prodigious with 342 is still alive. But it is interesting how many only got to 8-10 before they died.
https://www.cmuse.org/who-wrote-the-most-symphonies/

Tsutomu Yamaguchi
https://www.history.com/news/the-man-who-survived-two-atomic-bombs
One of maybe 175 that survived both bombings.

You do still need to properly conjugate it though.

Unless your in a state that doesn't require a reason to terminate. In those states as long as the "reported" reason is not one of the very few illegal ones they can certainly get rid of you. It then puts the entire onus on you to prove they fired you illegally. And just so you know the reason can be as simple as "failure to conform to company environment". That's a great generic reason and there's almost nothing you can say or do to prove that that's not the reason.

This is the way.

That's a thing? I mean news with the Kardashians in it. I went years where I had no clue who they were and this was when they were in their rising fame state. Even today, unless it's lambasted everywhere, I doubt I'd see something about them.

I like how some of them look genuinely puzzled about whats happening.

This is why there's a law on the books in Canada that says the other party is not admitting fault just because they say "sorry".

As someone who regularly gave change back that literally means nothing. Sometimes you slide the change in, sometimes you place it in. Sometimes you drop. It's much much more dependent on what and how much change you're giving to a customer. Tons of coins you're probably placing or dropping. Bills and change? Handing it or sliding it gently if the change is on top of the bills. Sometimes you just put the change next to them on the counter, though that's usually if they're doing something or their hands are busy.

The only issue I have with this is how the dude is resting his weapon. A wrong bump or a funny shift and he could have a serious problem.

It's sad, maybe, but I can almost hear them just by looking at this picture.
http://soundfxcenter.com/movies/star-wars/8d82b5_Star_Wars_Tusken_Raider_Warcry_Sound_Effect.mp3

This also leads to some rather uncomfortable and sometimes problematic issues. A liar thinks everyone lies. A thief thinks everyone steals. A cheater that everyone cheats etc.... They "think" that way because that's the way they would act or interact with the world. This does not mean that a liar can more easily spot a lie or a thief a thief. Just that that's the way they view the world. Observations should not be limited to just what you think about and is not always easier to spot something just because you're "thinking" about it. Observation is a skill you need to work at and what you observe is entirely dependent on what "you" can actually observe.

Toad. I always take Toad.

When you reach the point in learning where you think you know what you're doing but haven't reached the point where realize you really don't know and need to learn more.

The Indian guy.

Not a new thing. Grocery stores would occasionally mark up cans that were a quarter that weren't selling and sell them 3 for a $1.
1: Do you math?
2: Sure, occasionally. Stay away from the hard stuff. Never do coke.
1: I said math. You know 1+1=2.
2: Oh, Oh, "Math." No, I try not too.
1: You don't say.

Hmm, yes. That obscure indie band "The Cure".

Because no one can be courageous with fear. A fearless dog can't be courageous only stupid. Courage was afraid of everything and yet he didn't let that stop him.

Skipping the rest of the comments and answering the question originally posed. We'd be hosed. There's no Independence Day like comeback. Any advanced race that manages to cross the vast distances to "invade" us would likely only consider us pests at best. Likely about the level we think of raccoons. At worst they'd ignore us since nothing we could do would even reach the level of inconvenience.

The ability to know you could do so much better but don't have the ambition or drive to bother.