If you concede that microevolution is valid, how can you deny evolution as a whole? Say a mutation causes a lizard to be a different color, but that color allows it to blend in with its enviroment better, helping it hide from predators. This makes it more likely the lizard will live long enough to procreate and pass on its genes. There's a chance it's genes will keep spreading, and the entire species may eventually be that color. With enough changes like that over incredibly long time period, an entirely new species can be created. That's how evolution works through natural selection, and there's lots of evidence for it. Please tell me exactly how you don't think it's observable. And on abiogenesis: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob
I don't know anything about abiogenesis but this is a good resource. And even if it's completely wrong, I know many religious people that think the animals were created by God and then they evolved because evolution is undeniable.

You're commenting on a year old religious debate but what you said was stupid enough I feel the need to correct you. Actually, in the scientific community and the real world outside your bubble of religious propoganda and willful ignorance, evolution is FACT. you can't deny the evidence. And the notion that "science can't explain the beginning of the universe" is stupid. Not too long ago we barely understand what those lights in the sky are. If science keeps progressing we will learn much about our universe's origin and may be able to fully understand it some day. Ps "World view to interpret facts?" That's called "confirmation bias. Lol. "Explanations outside the natural laws" are just dumb superstitions to make us feel better about what we don't understand.

that'd be easier tho. that'd be like going from barefoot water skiing to water skiing with actual skiis

That's hot

you were taught grammar less than geography? isn't that required ciriculum? (i know that was spelled wrong shuddup)

thank god those nefarious *coffee shops* havent invaded my town!

i hate you times omega^2!

lmao thats what i thought first as well

Congrats for existing

No he does care, a lot, as shown in the episode where he chooses to die to save morty before realizing he can save his own life as well

I think there are only 10 or so people left on earth coming up with original jokes and everyone else just repeats them in various places

i dont like her either but can we stop the hate circlejerk? she didn't "ruin art." she looks like a person in a specific painting. just because the public opinion of her is negative doesnt mean you have absorb that prepackaged opinion and spit it out all the time jesus. saying she "ruined art" is just idiotic. i dare you to have an original thought. fuck

...or its just ironic humor

*even more canned laughter*

that exact phrase has been copied that much? damn

https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/6fte1n/i_just_want_someone_who_looks_at_me_the_way_gal/
WOO WOO ITS THE COMMENT POLICE BITCH you got called out

When that amazing comeback is downvoted instead of the upvotes it deserves... it's the truth, a publically self-proclaimed atheist would never have a shot at the election. Obama wasn't christian and I doubt trump is. It's basically a requirement to fake being religious for presidency