this dies when i die, bye bye

@serosenpai both of those links were just the same website that doesn't base anything off of science, just traditional opinions and sexist overtones. Blaire White also isn't a legible source, even if she is transgender. I gave you educated sources from harvard and national geographic, and you gave links from a website called "judgeybitch"

its called answering your questions uwu so where's your link to your sources then?

boobs are only sexualized in western culture. in many parts of Asia, and other parts of the world, they call americans babies for how attached to breast they are. Breasts are also not considered reproductive organs. Men have glands that allow for lactation as well, yet you don't see people calling out men for going shirtless.

1. they did dress genetics in biological terms. the second one is about tolerance, something people need to learn, including you.
2. They used trans kids because the majority of assholes only know trans kids and pay no attention to non-conforming genders
3. yes they did not mention chromosomes, but they did address biological sex.
4. i didn't slap a kid on it to make you feel bad. it's called using examples of actual people that you really need to be reminded about
5. schools block biased and non credible sources of information for the reasons of reports on current events

@serosenpai
1. who they are is not a lie
2. there are no made up words. all fords used in legit gender confrontation is in the english language
3. i never twisted your question, you are very obviously biased in the sense of sex=gender, so whatever is in between your legs is your gender
4. gender is who you are. your personality is who you are.

you know what, i actually have questions for you. Why is it so hard for you to just be accepting of other people? It doesn't hurt you to call someone their preferred pronouns, it doesn't hurt you to validate them, so why do you oppose and oppress these people who have done nothing to hurt you? why can't you let them be themselves in a sense as simple as whether male or female? Unless they identify as a fucking dragon or notebook sheet, there is no reason for you to try and tell these people their entire personality isn't real.

and wow, heres another link that talks about the science of it as well as statistics, genetics, chromosomes, and credible sources for their claims
http://www.tolerance.org/gender-spectrum

I'm just stating that to say religion isn't a credible source. Your school computer probably blocks it because it's not credible sources. Im on a school computer too, and my sources haven't been blocked because they are considered credible sources by our schools censors. if you haven't noticed, the majority of sources defending gender as not a binary are generally conservative leaning sites that believe in alternative facts.

and you're the one not making an effort to consider what I'm saying. again, here's a source from national geographic http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/how-science-helps-us-understand-gender-identity/
If you have a better source that isn't just "Boys have a penis girls have a vagina!!!11!!", Xy and XX chromosomes (which there are more than just those two combinations) and doesn't revolve around religion, go ahead and send it

what does that have to do with anything? i think you're running out of legit reasons to argue. we are having a debate, lets do it like adults, not like assholes.

sex is not fluid. gender is not sex. the two links are both different and do go in depth, you're just not opening your mind to the idea. The second link proves that are gender, biologically does not coincide with our sex. not that hard to understand

and one more thing, 1 in 15,000 people is still 5,333,334 people in the world. they exist and deserve to be recognized

in fact here is a link with their sources backed at the bottom of the page, and goes into the brain to explain it http://www.theplaidzebra.com/science-finally-supports-that-we-are-all-born-as-blank-slates-and-gender-is-merely-a-construct/

https://www.genderspectrum.org/quick-links/understanding-gender/ here's another link then that quotes their sources and i feel like it explains the spectrum well.

http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/gender-lines-science-transgender-identity/
Harvard.
http://www.medicaldaily.com/challenging-gender-identity-biologists-say-gender-expands-across-spectrum-rather-323956
these guys too

I really don't think you are even listening to me, or trying to comprehend what I'm saying. Gender is a literally proven construct of the mind. the fact that you won't even open your mind enough to comprehend what I'm saying shows just how closed minded you are. Im listening to you, and you're puling up questions that are easily answered, or statements that don't make sense at all.

because it's been proven to be a spectrum, which includes the possibility of being neither.

"Gender - the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones)." Thats the literal definition

@silvermyth gender is not chromosomes

Omg you angry baby boomers need to give up ignoring the flaws in society already! Y'all just repeating the same crap!