I was about to say the same thing. ICE.....publishing propaganda? I doubt that.

The solution is simple as far as I can tell. GTFO of Flint Michigan.

Yep^
The Flint water problem blame lands solely on the heads of the City officials that allowed it. Federal tax dollars (yours and my money) dont belong anywhere near it.

With Nixon, the House specified a crime, then proved that he committed it.
.
With Trump, the House made broad accusations, then found a bunch of people who disagreed with how Trump has executed foreign policy and called them witnesses.

Sassy, i understand your point. What you're considering is an envy driven redistribution of wealth and to be honest, it would probably have some immediate positive effects. The problem lies in the future.
.
If it started to look like Warren's plan were going to be implemented, the wealthy would immediately begin moving their money out of the United States. That abrupt removal of capital from an economy would absolutely gut businesses. Every stock, mutual fund and 401k would crash. Companies would be instantly thrust into a cash flow save mode and people would loose their jobs at an unprecedented rate.
.
I assure you that Warren knows this and that she would never actually implement something like this. It's pure envy based propaganda. She's lying to everyone and the bulk of americans know it. That is why her support is falling.

^ yes

So you're saying that of the billions of people in 32 nations, none of them are broken from medical issues? That's amazing. We should tell those 32 nations!

That was my thought too.

I've never heard that, but it sure makes sense. Is it true?

In fact it seems plausible that a religion might even materialize as a way to help massive groups of people do, and not do, the things that help us advance as a species.
.
We can't all spend our lives studying existentialism. We need farmers and builders etc. So lets just set a bunch of rules that shape people to a moral standard that will help us advance as a society. Then we can set some consequences for not adhering to the rules. Make the ruling character all knowing, all powerful and unquantifiable. Then just write all the teachings in story form so that it's interesting and more likely to spread?

But why does your freedom to stay alive trump someone else's freedom of choice to end your life? Who decides that compassion is the value that a society should use to judge people? Who ever made the rule that a healthy society is one that rejects murder?
.
For the record, I believe murder is very wrong. But without a basis to compare against (for example religion), I'm afraid I also believe that right and wrong are largely arbitrary.
.
That being said I think people are much more capable of continuing humanity if they build trust and work together. A natural deterrent of trust would be certainly be murdering someone for minimal reasons. It seems to me that a natural societal evolution of humanity would likely have fewer murders (as a %) as we evolved (either with or without religion).