So needless to say!

Can confirm. Was the philosophy

You're right in saying that monetary value to enjoyment value is very subjective. What I meant to say is that game designers shouldn't rely on players willing (or gullible enough) to keep repeatedly paying more money into a game. I feel that they should go the route of designing a game that keeps you coming back to it, and thus to any future products said company might make.

Then it sounds like you're playing the wrong kinda of games. You should never reach a point in ANY game where the design of the game suggests you put in more money than what it's already worth.

Personally, I'm just glad that Castlevania is getting the treatment is rightfully deserves. I've waited almost a decade for them to come whippin' in.

The FBI would like to have a word with you, cycy.