Sorry boss, yea I’m going to be late again… 4 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I had a rooster like that. He was delicious.
1
Took a bit to find 9 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
@cakelover @that_creepy_guy please don’t accuse me of putting words in your mouth and put words in mine.
I agree; humans can relate to a great many humans, objects, ideas. Just as dark skinned people can relate to light skinned characters, light skinned people can relate to dark skinned characters. Right? If the skin color doesn’t matter, why does it matter?
I have put no words in your mouth, but I did ask a question relevant to the topic. Yes, people can and do relate to figures that do not look to them, but my question stands—does it matter if people see figures that look like them?
Dark skinned girls were able to relate to light skinned Ariel, why can’t light skinned girls relate to dark skinned Ariel? She’s a mythical creature—there’s no ethnic heritage to portray. There’s no cultural background. The skin color is meaningless to the story.
So, what am I missing?
·
Edited 1 year ago
I agree; humans can relate to a great many humans, objects, ideas. Just as dark skinned people can relate to light skinned characters, light skinned people can relate to dark skinned characters. Right? If the skin color doesn’t matter, why does it matter?
I have put no words in your mouth, but I did ask a question relevant to the topic. Yes, people can and do relate to figures that do not look to them, but my question stands—does it matter if people see figures that look like them?
Dark skinned girls were able to relate to light skinned Ariel, why can’t light skinned girls relate to dark skinned Ariel? She’s a mythical creature—there’s no ethnic heritage to portray. There’s no cultural background. The skin color is meaningless to the story.
So, what am I missing?
Took a bit to find 9 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
Is that to say that you don’t think it matters if people see characters in movies and TV that look like them?
▼
Stop 22 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
Sorry, I missed your point above… I was awake in the middle of the night (and I guess not on my best thinking). I promise I read it, before arguing :)
You make a really good point about unskilled labor. I very much worry for all the people (who aren’t just kids in their first job). A lot of these jobs are already insufficient and to narrow the pool even further is going to create such a difficult situation for so many families and individuals. I live in a very rural area. I know a lot of people who work very hard, but can’t make a phone call at the end of the month because they are out of minutes, can’t afford to go to the doctor, or make home or vehicle repairs. I worry a lot about what happens next. I guess I’m just rambling. But I’m worried.
1
You make a really good point about unskilled labor. I very much worry for all the people (who aren’t just kids in their first job). A lot of these jobs are already insufficient and to narrow the pool even further is going to create such a difficult situation for so many families and individuals. I live in a very rural area. I know a lot of people who work very hard, but can’t make a phone call at the end of the month because they are out of minutes, can’t afford to go to the doctor, or make home or vehicle repairs. I worry a lot about what happens next. I guess I’m just rambling. But I’m worried.
It’s a double standard 23 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I think you’re correct that maybe people don’t see their privilege. And, even if you do see it, quantifying the impact on your life can be very difficult.
2
Stop 22 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
In 1920, the median cost of a house in the US was near $6,300, while the median household income was about $2,100 (about 33% of the cost of a home).
In 1980, the median cost of a house in the US was near $65,000, while the median family income was around $20,000 (about 31% of the cost of a home). The cost to deliver a baby was around $1,500.
Today, the median cost of a house is near $425,000, while the median family income is about $55,000 (about 13% of the cost of a home). The cost to deliver a baby is around $20,000 (with insurance).
It’s not about the rising cost, it’s about the rising disproportion. It’s not just housing, but housing is a great poignant example. When you consider that in 1920 and 1980, that family income was much likely to be generated by one person working out of home than it is today, that number seems a lot more stark.
2
In 1980, the median cost of a house in the US was near $65,000, while the median family income was around $20,000 (about 31% of the cost of a home). The cost to deliver a baby was around $1,500.
Today, the median cost of a house is near $425,000, while the median family income is about $55,000 (about 13% of the cost of a home). The cost to deliver a baby is around $20,000 (with insurance).
It’s not about the rising cost, it’s about the rising disproportion. It’s not just housing, but housing is a great poignant example. When you consider that in 1920 and 1980, that family income was much likely to be generated by one person working out of home than it is today, that number seems a lot more stark.
Some things just need to be reshared 2 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I like to think of this guy systematically sending a message asking “are you Tim” to a slew of numbers i digit different than his own.
1
It’s a double standard 23 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I think a notable thing here, is that for men, height is often more of an insecurity than weight and for women weight is usually more of and insecurity.
The two are pitted against each other because women expressing preference for taller men, makes some men who feel sensitive about their height lash out at a known insecurity of women. That’s why people don’t like it. It’s not a double standard—especially when you consider that tall women report all sorts of rejection by men who don’t want to date women taller than them. The opposite of “I don’t date short men,” is “I don’t date tall women.”
And, it is okay to not want to date women (or men) who are overweight—it’s just problematic when that preference is a smack back to ‘you’ve hurt my feelings.’ People are responding to the context, not the statement.
1
The two are pitted against each other because women expressing preference for taller men, makes some men who feel sensitive about their height lash out at a known insecurity of women. That’s why people don’t like it. It’s not a double standard—especially when you consider that tall women report all sorts of rejection by men who don’t want to date women taller than them. The opposite of “I don’t date short men,” is “I don’t date tall women.”
And, it is okay to not want to date women (or men) who are overweight—it’s just problematic when that preference is a smack back to ‘you’ve hurt my feelings.’ People are responding to the context, not the statement.
Power might corrupt 3 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
My organization hired an VP, to manage between the CMO and the department heads. At the time it was a small company, so a lot things had to be requested directly from the CMO. Things like conferences and continuing Ed. I fought really hard to send my reports to events—I felt strongly that it mattered. But my proposals got shot down a lot. And the CMO thought that as the department leader, it should be me that attended (even if I offered to forgo attendance so that one of my team members could have the experience).
So one day, in a team meeting (all my reports are there) the new VP asks me if I ever let my reports attend anything or if I just keep all the opportunities for myself. As if I was the one making these decisions…
So one day, in a team meeting (all my reports are there) the new VP asks me if I ever let my reports attend anything or if I just keep all the opportunities for myself. As if I was the one making these decisions…
He he he 4 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I wonder if this parent realizes there’s pornographic content under their clothes.
3
Any ideas? 8 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
And, I know that’s almost never what people mean, but I can’t help but go there first.
1
Just a coincidence 1 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
Idk. I guess it depends on what you’re into, but based on those last two photos, I might advised against that girl.
1
Savage on another level! 18 comments
Savage on another level! 18 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
In this case, the photographer was a friend of the couple (someone they might have invited as a guest, rather than just hired). He started taking photos at 11 and by 5pm, when the food was served, he needed a break. I’d say that’s not unreasonable to want a snack and break after 6 hours of work, when there are 2 hours left (in fact, it’s required by law in the US). Also, he’s a dog groomer by trade and not a professional photographer.
1
Must've tasted good 5 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I remember that rumor. He was a hot topic since he lived in the same area I grew up in. We went to the same community college (not at the same time).
Typical france 12 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
US laws regarding what you can fire someone for are pretty loose—particularly in “right to work states” (see how they made it sound like it’s good for you!). This is more difficult in places where unions are active and present because the unions typically negotiate more direct reasons for termination.
Now, just because someone fires you for a dumb reason, doesn’t mean you can’t fight it. However, there’s a limit to that value. So, if an employer offers some sort of severance you often loose your case. Simply for the matter that you can’t demand much more than lost wages, for a reasonable period of time.
3
Now, just because someone fires you for a dumb reason, doesn’t mean you can’t fight it. However, there’s a limit to that value. So, if an employer offers some sort of severance you often loose your case. Simply for the matter that you can’t demand much more than lost wages, for a reasonable period of time.
Can you find the owl 4 comments
roanoke
· 1 year ago
I was mostly just outraged that I was tricked into closely viewing the spiders. I was all like, there’s the hidden animal! …it doesn’t look like an owl though… it looks like…