Scatmandingo

scatmandingo


Pruritus Ani

— Scatmandingo Report User
extra motivation 3 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Does this mean women are going to be more reasonable about anal?
2
Egg-Eating Snake Defensive Behavior [SnekSubstance] 2 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Don’t make me get swirly, bitch.
1
Luke your mother said last night "That's a nice tip" 6 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Good thing you have that red arrow to point them out.
8
Cat Conceals Gov'ment Drone 4 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
We have always loved our cats. We have never trusted our cats.
7
Know the signs. Help your friends. 2 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
This a very handy instructional guide. I located a couple things I’m not doing.
1
She is so pure! 2 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
That was one of my favorites.
1
Select All Squares With Bicycles 23 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
What source would you consider valid?
1
Select All Squares With Bicycles 23 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
If they were seriously trying to hurt people they wouldn’t have sent in horses. Yes. We know about your bear cavalry. You did a bad job hiding it.
2
YugiPro #36 - Gel-ousy Is Not a Nice Thing 12 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
This is both nice and gel.
3
It's true, they do 10 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
What if I already think people like me a lot and I’m still not a fan?
1
You're also a racist 7 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Gotta somehow blame it on Leftists.
1
All according to keisatsu 2 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
The definition of win-win.
2
Society be like.. 15 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Maybe we will one day find out there is a mainstream media conspiracy to silence that one out of ten dentists but I think I’ll still use toothpaste in the meantime.
7
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
@xvarnah When you clog the chat about Valentines Day with your cry me a river bullshit about how oppressed you are individually and tell the userbase here to get used to the fact that you will be monopolizing the topic on this site I see you as a pearl clutching echo chamber troglodyte. The format thing was a cheap attack on a point made by you and your two buddies, and the methodology is sound, executed by professionals, and valid. Anything else is you whining about being a vocal minority convinced you are the silent majority.
SW day 35 5 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
They look pretty purple to me. Maybe I’m going colorblind in my old age.
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
@guest_ What’s the point? They make themselves out like victims, deny anything that doesn’t fit their narrative, downvote you and just continue their confirmation bias circle jerk. Seems to be the same thing on most sites nowadays.
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Same playbook every time. “I get to add any scope I want or you are gaslighting” or “Your proven methodology is invalid unless it comes to the conclusion I want” or “Everybody is in on the propaganda conspiracy except me”. Next will be “the reason I can’t provide evidence is because it’s being censored”.
.
Reactionaries are so clueless to how dumb their arguments are.
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
We were talking about the prevailing opinions on a protest and you tried to switch it to your narrative about the government when you couldn’t deny the data.
.
Classic cognitive dissonance.
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
And now the cognitive dissonance. Stay on topic. This is a valid survey.
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
And Mercury was in retrograde and the Rams were in the Super Bowl and whatever other irrelevant narrative you cook up does not affect the fact this was a scientifically valid survey of Canadian’s opinions. You must have missed the part where the Americans were only surveyed for contrast.
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
The answer to all those questions is just a click away using the link I already provided. Will you take the honest route and go learn that it’s a valid survey or will you continue the dishonest strategy of “just asking questions” in an attempt to muddy the argument so you don’t have to admit you are wrong?
1,546 respondents with margin of error of ±2.49%, 19 times out of 20 67 comments
scatmandingo · 2 years ago
Ski-bi dibby dib yo da dub dub
Yo da dub dub