I’ve seen the majority of her movie and endgame and honestly the vagina haver thing is about it
Like according to her movie she almost kills nick fury in what’s supposed to be a joke and according to endgame she is completely unconcerned about personal safety because she knows she’s invincible
She tanks a hit from the power stone which is supposed to destroy entire planets at a touch like for real why should I care it’s like Superman in any situation not involving kryptonite

What merits as a character? She seems to be better suited to a villain role to me, especially with the whole indestructible and all powerful thing

Ehh I’ll take this over gimps and nudity

Life hack: don’t do that

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Beeforged

You weren’t able to leave an actual review on rotten tomatoes before the movie came out, just say wether or not you wanted to see it. Can’t do that now because nobody wanted to see captain marvel, of course.

Please wait until the male is an adult to circumcise. http://www.savingsons.org/2014/05/infant-circumcision-vs-adult.html?m=1

Just look at pew research center’s stuff. They’ve done a ton of surveys based on sharia law and others. Here’s one with the sharia results:http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

I didn’t have evidence. I did say maybe, and the rest of my comment after the first part is me backing up my idea that maybe there is a correlation. It was a propositon, say, that the idea that mass shooting and inbreeding in Islam isn’t disconnected.

Wouldn’t the 50+% hate gays bit mean the ones who don’t hate gays are radicals?

Well, maybe the cause of the inbreeding is causing the shooters. For one thing, the Islamic faith says that martyrs get to go to heaven, so lots of men kill them selves doing this shit for the free pass as they think they are sinners. Women don’t because women are 1/2 men in Islam and thus don’t get free passes. Therefore, there’s lots of women around and less men, and therefore, polyamory, and then inadequacy on the parts of men without harems, then those men think it’s becuase they’re sinners and go martyr. This means that lots of kids have the same father or grandfather due to recursive martyrdom, so inbreeding.

Actually, Islam has changed. It used to be women could dress how they wanted to in Iran and the like. Now it’s eyes only or punishment. Islamic countries invented stuff like ALgebra and ALchemy, but now (possibly because of dictatorships caused by oil caused by the Fertile Crescent becoming a wasteland) they’re backwards scientifically.

Although, to loop this around to the origilnal point, killing someone to save them probably means the killer is mentally ill.

That may be so but seeing as Muslims quite recently in Britain campaigned against learning about the gays (and won) it doesn’t seem like there’s a way to do so, especially as most mulisms who hate the gays kill them on sight via rooftop it really seems to me the first step in stopping that is either getting to the kiddos before Islam or de-converting the haters from Islam first (which is punishable by death in Islam...) so they can actually talk to gays. You can’t have them talk to gays first because they see murder as compassionate so the gays and apostates stop sinning by being alive so they get a lesser sentence in hell.

There’s a positive correlation between Islam and inbreeding, so I think guest 1 was saying: yes Muslim shooters are mentally ill? I don’t know but this comment thread started with inbreeding so

I think that had something to do with monarchies in general, since most historical empires I can think of had a single ruler who held all power expect maybe Rome
Also what does this have to do with anuthing

So the majority of Islam is in fact mentally ill, according to the pew poll that over 50% of worldwide Muslims hate the gays?