Then the "Gotta be rich to win" thing that already soaks into the Olympics would get infinitely worse. If you don't care about fairness then sure.

I think the cyborg thing is a great idea personally. One of the biggest issues with robotics is the lack of a cemented goal, so I imagine it would be a great motivator.

*thousands of people die due to overdosing performance enhancers* Sounds like a plan

I said god in my life. You're a goddess which is different.

Dear guest, please read the other posts before spouting nonsense. The post immediately before yours explains exactly why Thanos did was he did and it wasn't what you stated. Thanks.

I hope their disappointed in the dishonest play rather than anything else

I posted it in another comment, so I'll repost here. As for not being able to create matter, the gauntlet is perfectly capable of that. The reality stone can simply create an area where the law of conservation of matter and energy doesn't apply to create an infinite source of matter and energy. Add the infinite energy from the power stone or even just making a new law specifically to create matter, and you are perfectly capable of doubling the resources. One of the reality stone powers is to make 2+2 equal 5 too, so it's hard to argue otherwise.

Thanos could easily double the resources, but he doesn't want to. When he didn't have the power to double the resources, his proposed solution was the kill half the population. People ignored his advice and his species was driven to extinction.

Thanos wanting to kill half the population is to verify that his original idea is a working model. It's vanity in a way.

Thanos could easily double the resources, but he doesn't want to. When he didn't have the power to double the resources, his proposed solution was the kill half the population. People ignored his advice and his species was driven to extinction.

Thanos wanting to kill half the population is to verify that his original idea is a working model. It's vanity in a way.

Yes.

Loki is the only god in my life

It wasn't the *size* of the universe in question. It was the limited resources.

I just checked my pants. i definitely wasn't a Sir so I gotta say no

That idea makes no sense. If you want the parents to be teaching the kids, then why even have a school system.

Also, knowing how to do your taxes is a pretty essential pathway to any career.

7

That's a massive debate because it's not only that person. Should someone have the right to knowingly put everyone around them at extreme risk? Does someone have the right to decide that the good of society isn't as great as their facebook feed's advice? It's a big tossup. Vaccinations are important because they have saved millions of lives with the potential to have already saved billions.

If you were the only person affected by not taking vaccines, then it wouldn't matter. But it's not just you. It's you, your neighbor, your children, your neighbor's children, the person you passed on the way to work, your coworkers, and every single person you come into contact with and possibly every person that that person comes into contact with is at a higher risk of dying or losing work.

*snap* Make that twenty more years

I think it would be considered unethical to allow the population to get too large after one or two *snaps*. We would learn to limit the population growth and it would be fine. One of the biggest indicators of a successful nation is a population that isn't growing nor shrinking.

JEFFERY YOU GET YO ASS BACK ONTO THIS BRANCH WE GONNA GO DOWN THIS SHITHOLE TOGETHER