Anyway, that's just my two cents. It's still a good film, there is no denying in that.

The way Nolan purposefully packages simple things as some kind of a mind bending idea is what is pseudo intellectual about the movie. As @smitty said, the film has a story and some decent characters, but that's about it. Inception was the beginning. At least it wasn't that hard to grasp. Let's be honest here, asking your audience to work out mathematic equations to find a proper ending does not equal a great film. Still, it's a good film. The cinematography, music, it was also peak McCoughnaissance. However, it was the beginning of Nolan doing technological expo dump through dialogue and it got SO much worse in Tenet. Inception was better film in my opinion cause it had a great story, some stakes, a mind bending plot that was quite clear, even to a casual movie goer.
I just wish that Nolan would stop making simple things look overcomplicated. He's one of the greatest filmmakers of our time, but man I am tired of watching him make puzzles instead of films.

I would much rather watch another Dunkirk than watch another movie where Nolan tries to redefine cinema.

Inception, maybe. Interstellar not so much. It's a fine movie, but it doesn't deserve that much acclaim.

Bruh, this is mainstream Zoomer humour. Cause it's ironic. If it weren't ironic, you might've had a point.

He's referred to as both Baba Yaga and the one who kills it.
Also, why did anyone downvote that comment lmao.

Unless you are management, you don't matter buddy. That or if you are an expert office politician.

Cause God hates us for our hubris