Define capitalism

He STILL created fortnite, though

I guess it worked

You guys must know about the centaurians that live in Paradise, Calinfornia! The truth is out there!

I disagree. There's a difference between gay clubs directed towards a certain sex (and the guys who force themselves into lesbian bars are admittedly assholes) and a male free "feminist" festival. You're excluding someone because they have a certain thing between their legs. If it was a "caucasian only festival" it would have been an uproar. Sadly, if it was a "black only festival" no one would care. It's a typical case of double standards. Also if it was a male only feminist festival (which actually would make just as much sense because males also have problems in our modern society, but still not justified) and some women would try get in and succeeded they would be "standing up for their rights" or something similar. A more appropriate name aould have been "female oriented" or "female focused" festival, since men actually could enter. Don't buy into everything vänsterpartister says.

The thing is, the poeple like these who get banned aren't using "cheats". They're using mods that fix bugs, makes the game run smoother, makes the game run at all, makes it look better etc. You know, stuff that you kind of need to get a $60 experience from bethesda games (even though 76 has been on a giant sale). It's not a mod that gives you free shit with the hit of a button, or instantly males you level 100 or aims for you. It's plugins and fixes. Besides, the bigger issue is that bethesda weren't that specific about third party mods when 76 was released. People didn't know what was and wasn't allowed. And don't say "then they shouldn't have taken the risk", because given the state 76 was and is in it is completely legitimate to use mods to get the experience that's expected from an AAA title.

"You ungrateful bastards" by saying that you're shitting on every other troop, every resistance fighter, every logistics personnel, every intelligence officer and anyone else who contributed to winning the war. America helped a lot when you decided to actually do so, but you didn't exactly win the war for us. It was a joint effort that relied on everyone to win. It's people like you, the "you're welcome" types, that make me not want to thank America. You're giving the opposite effect by being that stuck up, ironically.

You also need to consider all the mistakes the Germans did that contributed a lot to their downfall, and that's to no one's credit, rather their (Germany's) discredit.
And all the resistances in the conquered countries. There's too many factors.

You would definitely have lost wotjout Britain lr the Soviets. You're really discrediting them and their part in winning the war. Sure you had more industry and men to spare, but without Allies in Europe it would have been next to impossible to get a foothold. There are lots of and, ifs, or buts in the equation. I will say that you could POSSIBLY have defeated Germany alone. But it would have taken years and cost too much for both sides, as I already mentioned. And then the outcomes are still not certain. You had to fight and give a hell of a lot even with allies, there's no way you could have done it alone or even without one or two. Not even with men to spare. The war would probably have been lost without the US, but it would have been lost without Britain or the Soviets as well. So, back to my main point: you were a part of a joint force that together took down Germany, so stop making it sound like you were the biggest guy in the fight. You were not. You were part of a group effort.

Yes, but all that is theoretical. As soon as one of the allies would have fallen that's a lot of resources Germany can redirect in other directions. But as you admit, you wouldn't have been able to defeat Germany without the relentless and vast amount of Soviet troops or the British technological advancementes and intelligence. I mever said anything about Germany defeating the US on US soil, because then they would have the same problems as you did when facing them, crossing the Atlantic and getting a foothold. But that's not my point. My point is that some of the current generation of Americans, like princessmonstertru, think you did all the fighting and deserve all the praise in the world. If you stopped with the "you're welcome" like the stuck up bully in 3rd grade I wouldn't care if you took SOME of the honor. The 33% or so that you deserve. A little less if you count in French and Polish resistances.
.
I also forgot to mention Canada and Australia, they deserve praise too.

No, you were not the defining factor. If you would have taken away the Brits or the USSR from the equation it would have had the same effect. They were just as much a defining factor. Sure the lend lease helped, the new troops helped, but they were not the defining factor. You weren't the major reason for winning the war. If Germany had taken Brittany and the USSR there's no way in hell the US would have been able to take it back. I'm aware you helped out a lot, but not to the point that you're worth more thanks than the other allies.

So don't exaggerate your role and downplay the role of all the other nations who gave just as much as you if not more.

I didn't say you didn't help, I'm just saying you didn't do all the work and that the US was not the defining factor in winning the war and you shouldn't act like it either. Britain and the USSR endured so much more and were in the actual danger zone during a longer period of time. They deserve more thanks than the US, though the US deserves a lot of thanks as well. The US wouldn't have helped at all if it weren't for British intelligence, spies and all their clever plans to predict and fool the Germans. They wouldn't have had much of a chance if the Russians literally didn't throw themselves at the Germans on the eastern front. And while the Russians got hit hard by winter, the Germans didn't get a foothold there, which was more of a destructive blow to Germany than the USSR. Also you didn't really provide weapons. Resources, yes, but the US military wepaons at that time were not better than anyone elses. It's after the war you got the technological advantage...

Not true, the Germans were already starting to lose the war and overextending themselves before America joined. Sure, you helped, but you weren't the defining factor in winning the war. Stop with your "you're welcome" bullshit.

Me neither

Aye, gotta take advantage of it before I move out