Loophole?

Huh. Trust nothing on the internet then, I shall join the guest in celebrating this achievement.

Sadly not. The probe fell into a sea on earth.

I hope you understand that the Indian probe ended up in the sea.

Their mothers do it all the time. As long as they aren't swinging the pups/kittens like flails, they shuld be fine.

One on topic, I don't quite agree with your title. "White boys" with guns have killed far less than Islamic radicals and terrorists have for hundreds of years.

It would be discriminatory if travel agents had to ask if you ate bacon or not if they wanted to let you on the flight. There is not constitutional issue. If it was perfectly legal and okay for Obama and previous presidents to pass travel bans then it is fine for Trump to do so. He has not cut off all immigration from all muslim countries, he has stopped citizens of countries on a watchlist from coming to the US. And by the way it always tickles me that you and a thousand others are so focused on it being a muslim issue that I'm pretty sure none of care about non-muslim refugees who may have well been screwed over by the ban being implemented. Definitely a muslim issue though, poor muslims. How will they ever get to the States now for that western life-style they so desperately crave. By definition, you can argue that the EO is discriminating, but it's not making people go though planes kicking off people if they object to a picture of Mohammed or if they'll eat a bacon strip.

None of those countries have officially made an act of terrorism against the US, but what has happened is terrorist groups and individuals hailing from those predominantly muslim countries have committed enough acts of terrorism to where Obama's Adminstration made the list of the seven countries, believing that they should impose a temporary ban on the countries to try to get a better hold on how to stop terrorists from coming to American soil. Which they did. They imposed a similar ban on the same countries, the difference was, the Migrant Crisis wasn't in full swing, and not enough bombs had been dropped to really piss off the natives. Now that they are fleeing from ruined countries that bombs and warfare has torn apart, it is well known that terrorist groups recruit from people fleeing that area, and they want these people to go to the US and other Western countries to spread their idealogy and war to those places. Trump is simply imposing a more lengthy ban.

You've read what you've wanted from it, and using that, have made it into a muslim issue.

Please link all your evidence if you feel so strongly about it all. Besides, the NSA and the Feds stalk us all online watching what we do, doesn't matter too much, they all know what our fetishes are. It only seems you care enough about a part of the whole thing, since it's so disastrous to monitor a group more inclined to become terrorists than say, people coming in from Mexico.

It's like shouting at a deaf, dumb, and blind person. They'll never comprehend you.

I really want an answer if this person cares more about Muslims than about non-denominal refugees trying to find a better life.

Glad you can answer at least one of my questions. Can you answer the question I have about caring about Muslims only because they can claim oppressed status?

How will banning them stop them from using his golf course?

You know the whole "He has business there so he didn't ban them" is a load of crap. A bunch of "news" stories only ran that because it was their first gut reaction and they knew people who read their articles don't confirm the actuality of the statements enclosed within.
And it's pretty convenient that you can just still come back to "Well it still bans Muslims from THOSE countries, so it must be a Muslim thing. What about those who aren't Muslim who are fleeing those countries to find a better life? Are they just worth less because they aren't Muslim? Or do you only care about Muslims because they can claim some oppressed status?

Pence ran Indiana and it's right next to Illinois, the most broke state in the union. I'm pretty sure he picked pence because he wanted a competent VP.

He targeted the seven countries in the list had been compiled by his predecessor, because those countries had been noted as having a problem with extremists coming in and committing terrorist acts. He did not institute a ban on Muslims, he instituted a ban on any citizen from those countries, regardless of whether or not they were Muslim. It is not a violation of personal or religious freedom. It's simply a brick wall put up in front of a problem.