I don;t know if anyone has told you this, but wanting stronger borders and better border enforcement/policies doesn't equate to anti-immigration. It equates to giving the boot to anyone who does not go through the process of acquiring legal entry to a country, and turning back anyone who is a credible threat in the eyes of our courts of law.

Or someone scared that who they are is being threatened. I wouldn't hold it against them.

Okay then I guess I resort to cannibalism that won't include gay folks,

With lots of big guns, bless the French for that.

They'd probably get fired in all honesty. There's so many temp hires and whatnot that they probably can get away with firing people over small infractions without too much of a hassle.

My cousins picked up a job at amazon during their Christmas workload, and while they didn't tell me any terrible stories like this, it was not easy work. You had a five minute break to use the bathroom, and that included the walk to and back. If would not surprise me if some facilities are really harsh and strict enough to warrant what the post above claims.

Robbing a homeless guy of the stuff he has in his hat while he's begging is rewarding, just not in the way giving him some change out of your pocket would reward you.

That's life. No one is going to go through life being a perfect example of either paradigm. She's not asking for completely sterilized games, just for the choice, which is there. Many games let you be compassionate, but they also allow you to act on less helpful inclinations.

A pellet gun. Cracked a school window, and it classified under the same conditions, as the instance where 28 young children died. I find it hard to take that seriously.

Octopus, this sounds heartless, but only eight shootings from 2010 and onwards had fatalities over 5, the highest being Sandy Hook. There are over at least 70 cases where only one person or less was killed, and there are 7 instances of no one being wounded, or killed, and one of those seven bloodless shootings had an instance where a frigging pellet gun cracked a school building window. I fail to see how this record on Wikipedia is supposed to scare me.

Every time a games company backpedals onto "My player base who dislikes what we have revealed is sexist" kicks up a shitstorm. Just like how some "feminists" claim that since men have the potential to rape, they are all potential rapists, They effectively plug their ears to any actual criticism and pass it off as an invalid, sexist opinion. EA and Dice did not make the right decision to label their player base as misogynists. If they had handled it better, then there wouldn't be this mess currently mucking up the talk around Battlefield V. Better they come out of the gate saying Battlefield V is an interpretive take on the events of WW2 than fall back on that argument later. Controversial sure, but a far better action to take than label people who love your games as sexists.

I highly doubt that sexism thrives in the video gaming industry. No more than any other at any rate.

Did they just want to show off all the customization options available to players deviating from the bog standard GI Joe with a helmet covering half his face? I don't know but that's partly what is feels to me, but why not display all this on different characters instead of all on one?