thats kind of the point. The difference between a drug like cocaine and an assault rifle is that one is used for personal pleasure and also usually has solutions for addictions, it was the persons fault they used it, etc. With an assault rifle making it as difficult as possible to obtain would logically decrease the number of people killed. And additionally its not like an assault weapon even has a purpose other than killing other people, considering hunting rifles are much safer, and cheaper, for hunting, an assault rifles only purpose is for shooting another person. I doubt theres much disagreement about that.
On the link between firearms and guns: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2012/12/14/chart-the-u-s-has-far-more-gun-related-killings-than-any-other-developed-country/

her website list her positons: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/gun-violence-prevention/
I dont like her as a candidate as a whole but this is one of the few areas I have to give her credit on.

she's in favor of European model system, where they have MUCH lower gun homicides and deaths than America. Limited use of hunting rifles, bans on assault weaponds and high capacity magazines, a few more restrictions on concealed firearms, and the biggest one, closing the gun show loophole, and making sure all firearm purchases have a background check associated with them. Also, while I'm not sure this has been brought up, I'm personally in favor of a VOLUNTARY gun buy back program to limit fire arm deaths. And it isn't in her agenda, she's talked (quite at nausea really) about her positions on firearm control.

DAMMIT FLORIDA!

except facts are either true or false and tested with evidence and research: so when someone says that, in particular when relation to things involving science E.G. evolution and climate change in particular, it means that one of the parties aren't accepting reality and is kind of just ignorant and close minded...

That event is such a clusterfuck but here's a video that explains it well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btlqXbH1mCM

fruitcakecat, while she doesnt have direct blood on her hands, she did vote for the iraq war, and was a major advocate for the NSA, and additionally she is in favor of a lot of the interventions we do. And she is probably linked to the "Bernie bros" issue where she simply makes up a group of sexist bernie supports and somehow uses that as bases for an attack, or at least she lets the main stream media (which she is very much supported by) do it for her. She also has been shown to be linked to the leaking of the picuture of Obama in a traditonal african muslim-not-really-but-sorta-but-also-its-complicated outfit and trying to use that to suggest a lot of things.

You'd think that, idk maybe someone should fact check it before making such a LUDICROUS statement that doesn't even have a factual bases!

Oh okay. I'll be here if you wish to continue when you aren't thinking about how water is just wet air.

Dammit Texas.

1) WITH TAXES LETS GET A FEW THINGS STRAIGHT:
If you are an average income household
-YOU WILL NOT BE PAYING FOR COLLEGES
-YOU WILL NOT BE PAYING FOR INFRASTRUCTURE
-YOU WILL NOT BE PAYING FOR SOCIAL SECURITY
-YOU WILL NOT BE PAYING FOR NEAR ANYTHING BESIDES:
Healthcare.
Now, lets settle a few scores,
even before Obama care, so no arguments about Obama care raising the price which is about 2% true, the US paid more per capita than any other devolved countries and with all of that spending we got:
Worse health outcomes and a worse self reported health care system then all the other countries with a single payer health care system. So while yes households would see a 2.2% increase on their taxes, that also would come at the elimination of private health insurance, which takes up about 1/5-1/4 of the average Americans income, If you wish to see how everything will be paid for please read from THEIR website:
https://berniesanders.com/issues/how-bernie-pays-for-his-proposals/

Do not listen to the media such as CNN, Fox, MSNBC, NYT, etc. They are almost universally either
1: A company part of the establishment themselves or
2: Owned by a company that has a vested political interest (CNN, for example, is owned by time Warner, one of the biggest companies in the US and a very large political donator, particularly Hilary Clinton.)
So most of the mainstream news outlets are (to put it nicely) intentionally putting massive handicaps on Bernie sanders in particular, but they also do a sh*t job at actually doing what you would expect them to do on the Republican side.
I'm personally a fan of Bernie sanders, and have fought for him vigorously on this site, so I would like to know what POLICIES in particular you have a disagreement with, and why. But let me get a few things out of the way right of the bat: (counting to write)

*I don't like Donald trump and honestly with my understanding of the dictionary, he is a fascist. But credit where credit is due
.
Feel free to believe politically as you wish, ill be happy to debate anyone, but at least know what the candidates want before making an assessment of the entire political atmosphere.

Okay stop. Firstly, this whole notion of "it's all a joke!" Is near ALWAYS said by people who don't understand the basic platforms near all the people run on. You can disagree with all of them politically if your part of the VERY small percentage of people that have a basic or better grasp of the candidates ideas and platforms, but if you can't give even the major points of the candidates ideas (which isn't, things like "trumps a racist" (which is true but completely neglects the progressive part of platform such as infrastructure rebuilding and his opinion on money and politics) and "Bernie's a socialist!" (which is such a misleading but technically true statement. He's a democratic socialist, which is a mix of socialism and capitalism, similar to what the Nordic countries have. Another term that has a negative connotation, I'll be it a much more, but still not entirely proper by the common (and often incorrect) US perception of the word, is what's called a "welfare statuses")

No its just a really bad allergy.