... to it being needed. But no one things the rights restrictions are bad. Even the people who have these restrictions recognize them as good for them most of the time.
So here's the deal. Making one right's restriction doesn't allow room to make more. In fact, the more rights restrictions a person in one of our programs has, the more likely someone is to go "are all of these really nessicary?" And yeah, they are really nessicary. One man isn't allowed to leave his home without supervision because he has a history of violence in the community. One woman isn't allowed unregulated access to lighters because she nearly burned her house down smoking in her bedroom.
And I don't think its unreasonable to say "Children are required to get vaccinated against polio because polio crippled thousands of people"
If a child is admitted to the hospital with frostbite from being outside in winter for too long without proper attire, the parents are definitely going to be charged with neglect.

And obviously people with allergies shouldn't be made to take vaccines they are allergic to. Also, your quote is a fear tactic based anti vax propaganda. Notice how you didn't provide a source? Because this isn't a quite from someone who studies political science or medicine. We can't know what the consequences of requiring vaccines could be, but we do know that many things have been required by the government historically that have not lead to the drastic consequences people at the time were afraid of. We also know that while individual freedoms are protected, we have by and large chose as a country to value public safety over individual freedoms when sufficient evidence exists to require such a restriction.
I work for a company that provides services to people with disabilities. And some of those people have rights restrictions for their health and safety. And sometimes the health and safety of others. And putting such as restriction into place requires significant evidence...

@butterflyer99123 While some people are fine even if they are not vaccinated, this is largely luck. And vaccines have saved thousands of people's lives and nearly eliminated certain illnesses that once caused death and suffering to many people.
Not vaccinating children from diseases that could kill them should be considered child abuse. For the same reason that it is considered child abuse not to dress your child adequately for cold weather. They might be fine, but there is a significantly increased chance of them getting sick.
I think that adults should 100% have the right to refuse vaccines. If you are 18 and you don't want a flu shot, your business. If you don't want to get the Hepatitis B vaccine, that's your choice, and no one should judge you for that. But parents shouldn't have the right to refuse vaccines for their children.

So, did it really happen?

It might.

I'm really glad it was able to help you.
For me it was hope. If I could understand enough magic, I could use it. If I could use it, I could improve my life. It was the promise that I wasn't alone in the world, and I wasn't powerless. And I was able to find others who understood.

Sorry guys, I use my mom's Netflix.
I do really enjoy the series. You guys could probably watch it during the trial period as long as your lives aren't too busy. The entire series is a little less than 15 hours long.

Some of us have kettles. Some of us just heat up water in the microwave. I've seen people heat up water via coffee pot (they just dont add the coffee, obviously). Heating water isn't hard. We heat water in whatever manner is most convenient and suitable for our kitchen and tea drinking habits. Not all of us have the space for a kettle. Not everyone drinks enough tea for it to make sense to heat that much water. Just makes more sense to only heat a cup.
I really hope that non Americans being concerned over our lack of kettles is a joke. I feel like there are so many more real reasons to be concerned about Americans, and maybe this is one if the things that is done well in America.

this hotel is the ideal pied-à-terre to take advantage of all the wonders of Dublin, whether for a few days or for a longer stay.More of a Budget establishment
I lost count how how many repetitions of da this was

The person hiring mulls over his considerations over the weekend, and is leaning towards the man with more job experience, simply because it is the only distinguishing factor.
That weekend he sees of of his candidates out to dinner. It's the man he was leaning towards hiring. That man is out with his boyfriend.
The man in charge of hiring considers this greatly. He has nothing against gay people, but he is concerned that his sexual orientation will mean he will not be too soft. That he will end up costing the company money (they work in insurance) because he accepts claims that should be denied. The other man gets the job.
The first man should sue for discrimination. But he doesn't know. He has no reason to know the man hiring him even knew he was gay. He figured someone more qualified got the position. And he will probably find another job no problem. But that doesn't change the fact that he lost this job from perspective. Not merit.

@vitklim success isn't nessicary based on merit. It's often biased by perspective. Let's move away from gender for a moment. Look at 2 men, both 30, both have master's, both have the same type of job experience, but one has worked said job a year longer. The employer doesn't know what the other guy was doing the year before they started the job. It isn't reflected in his work history. It could have been anything (from backpacking through Europe to selling drugs. Just doesn't know)
So, the guy who has been working there longer has objectively more job experience. You can interview them both though, one guy could be friendlier or whatever. More professional in the way they hold themselves. I get it, interviews matter.
So they both interview. And they both do great. Friendly attitudes, dressed professionally. Both are white men with thin framed glasses and well trimmed facial hair.
Both are great candidates.

Actually most of what's unhealthy in the above picture is an excess of fats. And diabetes is a problem with regulation of blood sugar, which can be affected by eating to much sugar.

You spend 20$ a month on the world's worse phone plan because if your boss can't reach you you'll lose your job.
So, that's all the needs right? And you have 500$ a month left. Great job right?
Well, I said you earn about 1250$ a month, that's not what you take home after taxes. You still need to pay taxes. Also your job is legally required to pay for medical insurance, but not dental or eyecare so if you need either of those, you have to pay for that yourself. Plus co-pays if you do get sick.
Have we talked about transportation? You have to get to work. If the rent is 400$ taking a bus is almost definitely not an option. So now you have a car payment. And insurance, and gas.
It's easy to need more than you can afford. And that's with the best possible budgeting strategies. Which aren't taught in public schools so you can't expect everyone to know them.
And none of this covers if you have any dependents and assumes that you have no disabilities whatsoever.

If you work full time and make minimum wage in the United States, you only earn about $1250 dollars a month. If you can live in a place where rent is cheap, you might pay $400 a month for a studio apartment. (That's on the low end where I live, and the cost of living here is pretty low). Then you have water, electricity, and sewer. Things you have to pay, that's another 100$ easy. I'm assuming your being conservative here. The government believes that $200 a month can cover food. It's not true but hey, if you are willing to rat enough ramen let's say it is true. Let's say you spend 10$ a month on hygiene products. Shampoo, soap, toothpaste, ect. I bet your cheap appartment doesn't have a washer and dryer. Laundry mats are expensive. Let's say you spend 20$ a month there. You bring your own homemade detergent to save money, and hang your damp clothes to save a little.

I hadn't noticed. My bad.

Is this supposed to be a joke? I can't tell anymore

People also usually only use master balls on the pokemon they want more than any other. Its significant because you only get one masterball.

The brown bit was at the bottom of her iris, and to the side a bit. So you could only really see it if she was looking up and to the correct side (I don't remember if it was left or right anymore)

I was just fixing the issues. Glad you weren't offended, that wasn't my goal.

Hopefully people won't find themselves overwhelmed. I know that it definitely varies from person to person.
I know that for me, conversations on the subject became much easier after I was able to experience sex in a healthy and positive way. And sometimes sex is still difficult, but conversations aren't anymore.
I also know that isn't the case for everyone.