She has to get some campaign money some how

idk about that pluto has some pretty dang good ivy leagues

chill bruh everyone just needs to chill out there are too many salty people as of recent

no what im saying is that out farther west you get lots of republican votes almost more than democratic.

no dude china does not give a shiz about North korea china is not retarted like them and neither is russia you doubt the world leaders intelligence

yeah mid west is all republican except for colorado. The only western democratic states are the west coast which has the juggernaut that is california

where im from they do but my state is almost completely conservative

now this is what an argument should end as and i completely agree with you in fact i really dont have much of an argument against that

anything boosting us. I really just care about humans as a whole not so much that I despise animals.

here https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwjKlfKQ-pfQAhVEsFQKHUV2BVAQFggjMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quora.com%2FPhilosophy-of-Everyday-Life-What-percentage-of-the-worlds-land-is-populated-by-humans&usg=AFQjCNHDRbYf9vak1p09rOK2biY7eFUd8Q&sig2=q9w8AVOYgxRXoLdyDzoKpQ&bvm=bv.137904068,d.cGc omg that is hecka long. and btw we cool this is really just helping me pass the time. Also bringing it back I mean i think very highly of humans mostly because I am human. It is not that I hate animals but i just do not think we should go out of our way to try and prevent them from going extinct when they are endangered. I mean in some cases I feel they go endangered because they just dont have good skills such as a panda. Where I might have gone down the wrong path here for the sake of the argument is that I do believe in nursing a group that we have gone out of our way to kill like you said. For example the Wolf was really unjustified. It was for sport not for any

Well me and you obviously think of right in a different way. I mean what is right can vary all the way from a hunter to an activist but neither opinion on right can ever trump another. I think that we are justified in the case where it benefits us which in my mind is greater priority you im guessing believe that it is not justified in any way. But the fact is only %10 percent of all the land in the world in inhabited by humans and another %10 have no human activity at all. I think we have a long ways to go before over population and also far away from your global disaster.

we are superior we can kill any animal we want we are far more intelligent than any animal and sure disease does kill us and it affects other animals too. Also if you have ever seen the west you should know we are not anywhere near overpopulation. You are right though Animals can attack us but the consequence of that is their death. By the way im pretty sure when they build a house they dont go in kill every animal in the area. I think they just displace them to the millions of other uninhabited miles. I also dont think we just go kill what we want when we want I think if we need to make a decision where a few animals might lose their home or die to permanently benefit us I would pick us.

good enough for me

alright well first off who that tiger yet again takes MILES OF LAND TO ITSELF if it takes up that much space f that tiger i could care less if it died. Now passed that im curious on what basis do you think animals would have a right to attack us? My absolute priority is the further development of humans my race animals can survive live on and do what they want but if the preservation of an animal such as the panda which has absolutely no means of self defense cost us money and resources i could care less if it died. Humans are constantly expanding and growing we need more land and things which could be an animals home but if they cant defend it then i dont really see that as an issue. We being the superior species are allowed to take what we want when we want.