unicornsrock316

unicornsrock316


In the beginning there were three unicorns, the sky unicorn, the land unicorn and the sea unicorn.

— unicornsrock316 Report User
Tina knows what's up 30 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Are we talking 2nd wave or 3rd wave feminism?
1
I'm confused af right now 15 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But there is nearly as much demand for construction workers.
2
I'm confused af right now 15 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Simple supply and demand economics.
18
I'm joking but the candidates are really bad 35 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
That is legitimately the reason I'm protecting my rights and that is the reason the amendment was written.
1
Make it rain 6 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But that isn't the point. If we spent anymore on healthcare we'd have to raise taxes even more.
2 · Edited 4 years ago
After hearing that so many people searched for the meaning of #Brexit after voting 18 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Before the civil rights movement you had to take a reading test to vote in a lot of states, look at how that worked out.
8
Make it rain 6 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But the individual cannot pay for defending the free world and neither can an employer.
11 · Edited 4 years ago
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Because we put tea where it belongs, in the harbor!
4 · Edited 4 years ago
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
While the government doesn't seem to be trying to oppress us, we never know when it could start. Just look at college campuses where a lot of the colleges are somewhat funded by the government and you have to go to free speech zones instead of just saying your opinion wherever you are in the moment.
2
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Funsubstanceuser, thank you for respectfully pointing out my typo instead of using it against me. But I would like to say that Jihadists are just going to find ways to get semi-automic hand guns even if you ban them (and I would like to remind people that fully automatic guns are restricted to very few people with licenses). And if you say we need background checks for buying guns, we already do. And if you say that because he once was under investigation by the FBI, then I will say you can't take away someone's rights without due process.
3
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Darkanhell, I'm going to point out to you what I have already pointed out to many people in this comment section. This isn't a vigilante or gun problem, it's a mental health and radical Islam problem.
2 · Edited 4 years ago
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Move to the city of Chicago then. It has the most gun control in the country! I'm sure you'll love it.
2
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
In your argument against the second amendment you said that there were guns that could shoot massive amounts of people in a relatively short amount of time. Let me point you the Belton Flintlock Rifle which was capable of shooting 16 or 20 balls in 16, 10 or 5 seconds which the Founding Fathers knew about and commissioned but the deal ended up not going through because the guns were too expensive. Therefore if the Founding Fathers didn't want you to be able to buy those guns they would have specifically outlined it in the Second Amendment. And please tell me then how the First Amendment applies to the Internet.
1
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But she still gets shot and possibly dies instead of her maybe having a gun in her purse that she can use as an equalizer.
1
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
No, but what if a mugger pulls an old lady into an ally, how is she going to protect herself?
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But that still isn't an excuse for taking the right to keep and bare arms away from citizens.
1
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
You said that if they saw anyone with a gun that they would shoot them first. Check.
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But under your very own logic he would have shot security first.
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But if you have a loaded gun holstered then you just have to turn of the safety and less people get shot.
1
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
We did in 1776 and you say that wanting to live if someone attacks me isn't a good enough reason.
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
But I ask again, is the basic human right to self preservation considered a good enough reason and if the government controls what a good reason is then it will be a lot harder to get the guns needed to over throw them if they become tyrannical.
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
My point exactly.
1
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Well is self preservation considered a good enough reason?
1
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
And he isn't saying that you can't have your opinion, he is just asking why you care if it doesn't affect you one tiny bit.
2
Hmm... Couldn't possibly be the tight gun regulations, right? 173 comments
unicornsrock316 · 4 years ago
Pokethebear rebutt everything you said you. Can you read?
2