Why beat up when you can become a stalker exposing both of them as cheaters/people who fuck friends spouses for the rest of their life to anyone they meet ever including their bosses and the owners of shops they shop at

people are entitled the service of the military as they swore an oath. Medical people also swore an oath.

Nah, it's not that big, I think it's saint helens

I mean, you say that like none of my allergies could kill me

Basically everyone not just the boys in my elementary school (or at least in my grade) had been exploded to porn in some way be it friends showing them something they found or a sibling showing them or something by 7th grade at least

i have severe allergies to multiple things, example: certain nuts make my face swell up in seconds, horses make my entire system run overdrive and i start dripping so much snot, saliva, and tears out of my face that you could fill a bucket.
I dont typically bring one with me when i go out unless i expect there is a larger than nominal chance of me coming into contact with something im allergic to.

"dont blame the hacker for crashing your game, blame the devs who dont punish them for it"

if you dont understand the references the post isnt for you. its that simple.

it doesnt provide opportunity. There is a point of wealth where opportunity exists. Anything below that point progresses linearly up at a set rate/effort system and relies totally on luck to get above the line within a lifetime.
anything above the line has the possibility of either increasing faster linearly with hard work or exponentially with extreme tactics and bending the rules.
that line continues to rise faster than the wealth average does.

it is a right vs wrong discussion. Trying to use the same combination as your old lock on a new lock with a new input system is objectively incorrect. Just because someone learned something that used to be correct procedure doesnt make them not incorrect when the procedure changes.

"If it was illegal, I'd have enough time racked up to justify the incarcerations of every single black in the history of the US plus more. You're fucking wrong. "
pirating is illegal but 99% of people that do it dont get charged for it. Not worth the courts time. Not getting arrested and charged for a crime is not proof that it isn't illegal.
-
"Is this movie illegal due to American citizens, portraying Americans, killing a depiction of a real life, well known individual? No it's fucking not. "
comparing something that is legally defined as an artistic work with saying "id gladly take you with me" is disingenuous and not legally sound. Posts on a public forum are more than enough for a court of law in america to charge someone.
-
you act all holier than thou and get so heated and think yelling louder makes you right even tho your arguments are completely irrelevant and have absolutely no meaning.
-
false equivalences and illogical ranting does not an point make.

@i_ thats not how legal precedent works.
The ruling wasn't about the law regarding potus it was regarding the definition of a threat which they ruled didnt require any intent or actionability. That definition of threat isnt specific to any given law, thats not how legal definitions work. Their ruling on this case where someone broke X law can be used as precedent for every other law that regards the usage of the the legal term "threat"

Then make more

they want that, however their interest is directly proportional to the volume of the money