And Crowley! And maybe Lucifer! Let's just remake the entire movie into a Supernatural movie. We'd all be happier that way, except maybe for the feminazis.

Not even urban dictionary knows fuckingwhere, so I'm not buying into this.

Domestic violence is in most cases cyclical, the abused later becomes the abuser. It's sad, but it's psychology. It's just how these people think life works, at least those who are easily influenced and don't have a particularly strong will. I'm really glad you got out of it, and are making an effort to stay a civilized person.

Exactly. Same if you start turning the conversation another way and bring up unrelated stuff or start insulting the other person. You automatically lose the argument when you do that but it just hurts the other person, physically or emotionally.

If you resort to violence in an argument, even if the other person started it, you're a weak ass human being. If you can't stand your ground with solid argumentation and decide that different opinions than yours should be punished by beating, you're a weak willed coward. And notice that I never mentioned gender, because it applies to men and women both.

I'm a strong independent woman but I make the best nutella filled pancakes :3

Also I don't think "fuckingwhere" is a thing. Maybe like "bumfuck nowhere" but that's it.

Lol same

Exactly. It didn't so I was wondering if you were serious.

I thought being gay wasn't about conscious choice but rather about natural attraction...?

Well yeah, exactly, but a lot of people don't realize that disagreeing with someone doesn't mean you get to insult them or hate on them. That's not how a productive discussion starts. A productive discussion starts with you trying to find out why that person has a different opinion and/or try to disprove that opinion using your knowledge/experience. Or maybe find out if there was a misunderstanding, which happens sometimes since only a few people here are native English speakers.

Tbh people who start "flame wars" are just not very good at making arguments. Insulting your "opponent" instead of disproving their argument is just petty and helps no one.

Ikr, and I'm really glad you asked. It's sad that the common practice here is to assume and downvote instead of asking. Even though nobody here knows The Satanic Temple, I had thought that at least the words "atheistic satanist" might get them intrigued because it probably wouldn't make much sense to the average joe, but apparently I was wrong.

No no, they actually criticize how some Satanists are just edgy cultists, and that the Church of Satan "fetishizes authoritarianism" (got that from the Wikipedia page on The Satanic Temple)

It's an organisation of people who, despite being atheists, fight for equality of religions in the US. As we all know Christianity is very common there. The original thought (or at least that's how I understand it) was that it's nonsense that Christian organisations get so much state funding, compared to other religions that don't get anything, and they call themselves Satanists just because it's a controversial thing to most Christians. They also fight against Westboro which is a noble goal in itself.
Examples of stuff they did: put up a big statue of Baphomet to show that they should have the same freedom of religion as Christians who put up a statue of the 10 commandments some weeks earlier, handed out "Satanic children's books" in schools (which contained the satanic tenets, you should look them up, much more common sense that the 10 commandments), organized a LGBT makeout party on WBC owner's mother grave (I find this one a bit edgy but it was just a big "fuck you" to WBC anyway)

Judging by the medieval standards of royalty, yes. Judging by for example today's British royal family, no. They're just glorified celebrities imo, and hold no actual power whatsoever. At least not anymore.

Huh, looks like FS doesn't know about Satanic Temple. I had thought that someone would get my reference and know that they're actually really nice people who fight for religious freedom and equality, but oh well.

https://inews.co.uk/essentials/news/politics/wasnt-mad-cow-disease-made-people-vote-brexit/
Took me 5 seconds to google this, garlog is obviously right. Nevermind the fact that it is the most obvious photoshop work I've ever seen.

Lucky you. My skin is not even that pale, I actually tan easily, but it's thin af and you can see all the veins and it's super gross.
In the spirit of staying positive, though, I'll say I really like my eye colour. And my hair, when it decides to cooperate with me.

That it does, at least for now.

Fair enough, but I still don't think "You know this movie/series?" "I've heard about it" really qualifies as striking up a decent conversation. Small talk at best.