Oh, I see.

Good for you. I watch/listen to several news channels and they don't mention them much, even though some of them focus a lot on the wars in the Middle East. But they probably got overshadowed by all the news about Putin and Erdogan being besties now.
What newspapers do you read? Local ones or some bigger stream?

Forgot to log in, still hoping someone will explain cause I'm just confused.

The problem with a lot of Chinese stuff is that it breaks after a while because they often spare a lot of money on materials. But actually, brands like Xiaomi or Huawei are quite popular in my country because they're Chinese (therefore not expensive), but with pretty good manufacturing. I was seriously considering buying a Xiaomi Redmi for myself when my 7 year old HTC started having problems like randomly shutting down and not being able to turn on unless it was plugged into a power source (even when the battery was 100%), but then I decided for an LG Nexus 5x because a) I love the Google interface and the fact that it's a "clean" Android (no extra bullshit widgets like Samsung or HTC has), b) the new Huawei Nexus 6 just came out, therefore this one was discounted by like 50% (meaning it was even cheaper than the Chinese phones), and there's very little difference between the older and the newer Nexus.

I know, I know, I was making a joke. You're right, but that's still overpriced af.

Yeah, the whole "gays making out on WBC founder's mother's grave" was kinda edgy, but they can usually get the point across. Dawkins is a great man indeed, I also like the YT channel SecularTalk - the presenter (Kyle) speaks mostly about politics but also about ridiculous situations involving religion all around the world, and 99% of the time he's spot on imho.

That's reasonable enough, I just don't see how inventing a moderately probable scenario is homophobic. I wouldn't be surprised if this fictional priest got sued, you know how sue-happy Americans often are. That being said, I agree with you on the religion thing. You should look up the Satanic Temple, they're an atheist organization who fights against the enormous government support that Christianity gets in the US, and using the image of Satan because it's a controversy for most Christians. They also go against WBC which is a noble goal in itself.

What are you on about, honestly? At first you react to chakun's "I think you should be able to refuse something that goes against your religion" with calling him a homophobe, and now you turn 180° and say that if a priest did it, he wouldn't have to be afraid of legal consequences because those are the matters of Church? So are you for or against freedom of religion?
You keep saying I'm not informed but so far you've only been stating the obvious, contradicting yourself and assuming my sources are from a pub.

I really hope so.

Ironically enough a judge refused to wed an atheist couple recently. With that crazy stuff happening, I would not be surprised if the situation chakun was trying to describe happened.
What is there to get informed about? Please, enlighten me.

It could happen. It's not hard to imagine this happening in the US, and it's not much harder to imagine it turning into a religious bigots vs liberal pussies shitstorm. And if "well it hasn't happened yet so that means it can't happen" is the best argument you could come up with, well, my condolences.

No problem, I actually liked your comment. I think simple politeness to people of all genders, ages, races, ethnicities, religions should be a standard.

Yo guys I agree with chakun on this one. However much I dislike religion and homophobia, you shouldn't be forced to do anything that goes against your beliefs. It's called freedom of religion. The hypothetical couple can go to any other church, or just not have a wedding at a church.
Although I think there are some gray areas here, because the Church is funded by the government and therefore should probably abide by whatever the government says, when the government is called upon to solve the problem. Private businesses, that's a different matter. The can refuse service to whomever they want.
Having said that, I think both of your argumentation skills need a lot of work. Using "pulled out of my ass" and "bigot" does NOT make for a solid argument, unless you want to be seen as "that guy who can't handle losing so he starts throwing insults around".

Which is why I specifically wrote "child".
I agree with the rest, though.